no, I said there would be no need for improvement or augmentation as your examples show because in the context I have been pointing out( that being ID and not the abuse of it) there would be no need for it.
In another context, that is to say augment, that is another thing alltogether.
When proper accurate ID is established how exactly do you imrpove it? See you don't because you have already attained that which was saught. That being ID.
Use of it is not the same thing as the ID itself. I cannot see where people do not understand the difference.
ID'ing you properly in a traffic stop is not the same as tracking your movements thru wal mart to sears to the bank and back home.....unless of course you are a convicted felon on house arrest.....
I would say that taking it to a level of tracking is falsely labeled as an imrpovement. I would call that something else all together.