Posted on 06/27/2006 7:06:16 AM PDT by soccer_maniac
Defending champs Brazil encounter surprise Group E second place finishers Ghana (10:55 a.m. ET ESPN). Then, at 2:55 p.m. (ESPN), European powehouses Spain and France meet.
(Excerpt) Read more at fifaworldcup.yahoo.com ...
Who is showing the replay?
Well I'll be watching it in the UK so I don't know if I can help you with TV schedules.
However, this website shows every single goal in the World Cup and might be of some use. My work computer is unable to view it though:
http://www.11football.com/coupedumonde2006/
So it's not a matter of how it actually looks?
I'm not trolling at all, I'm only responding to you.
You were the one who brought up homosexuals.
You are the one using phrases like "butts plugged" and "bend over and take it like a man." I merely called a spade a spade.
Oh, and I have no idols in the NFL, that's just another one of your wild presumptions.
...the one who brought up homosexuals.
Wow, you've posted yet another queer allusion. How . . . surprising.
BBC:
“Adriano doubles Brazil's lead, tapping in a cross from Cafu after a sweeping end-to-end move - but it was clearly offside.”
The Guardian:
“Injustice! Lucio charged forward and fed Cafu down the right. He centred to Adriano, who tapped it home from a clearly offside position!”
The Times:
“Lucio picks it up in the middle of his half, gallops forward, feeds Kaka, then Cafu on the right in the blink of an eye. His cross is deep, where Adriano has been quick enough not just to get up the pitch, but also to be offside. However, the richochet is enough, it goes in and the linesman is harrangued. Still, that's 2-0. Definitely offside, but too late.”
It’s not just because they say it’s offside that I believe them, it’s that they’re all so adamant about it.
Someone please help the troll find an NFL chat zone. Apparently they are all busy preparing their syringes.
Good luck with your trolling. Try a baseball thread and you can do it all over again.
Since when do you have to be a homo to have your butt stuck with steroids.
Not that there's anything wrong with them/you.
"Who did you pick for the France-Spain game?"
I have no preferences for either. Perhaps France has an edge.
If I didn't know anything about football, I would wonder why they had to be so close....but as you say, I guess it doesn't matter about how things look to millions of viewers, just how we think it looks.
Ghana with all their yellow cards is now up a man, but they still haven't found the net. They've played well though. Or Brazil is also not playing that well.
Yellow/Red for diving - nice one ;-).
(Although I root for Ghana, but fair's fair.)
Did you say something homer?
Did you previously make a pick? Just curious.
(My bet is already in.)
And they won't find the net... they were beat mentally before walking onto the field.
D'oh?
Roberto scores with 6 minutes remaining, making it 3-0 and sealing it for Brazil.
Yes, and my name is not homer. Please share with us some insightful information on the beautiful game.
We are all dying to hear your brilliant insights.
Nope, I really have no preference for either team.
It has seemed pretty well sealed up from 2-0--not to knock team Ghana (I like rooting for the underdog).
Should I open a fine Oil Can to enjoy this afternoon's match or await some brilliant insight from the NFL troll?
Moving right along. 3-0. Almost unfair as Ghana's performance is not represented in the result. Would have been interesting if Eisien had played.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.