Sacajaweau, what you are describing is what I've heard called "consciousness of guilt".
To nopardons, who will say he didn't murder Polly Klaas but he was obsessed with her, or the other children whose murders he also closely followed, I say, if he murdered JonBenet that is the only one of the famous ones that he needs to be guilty of in order for him to fold them into his "consciousness of guilt". Not that he personally did them, but they fit into his thought patterns and even action patterns, if he's a child murderer himself.
Nopardons says Karr claimed to be at a party at the Ramseys on Christmas Day, and of course there wasn't one.
Incorrect...he claimed to have been at a party prior to the murder, did not say it was on Christmas day. The media reported that the Ramseys had one on the 23rd and suggested that was the one he was claiming to be at (I'm not saying he WAS, just talking about his claim.).
Onyx, you joked that he might be "a valid suspect" alright, in quoting MY words to that effect, because after all he was brought all the way from Thailand. Took it as a joke anyway and a sarcastic knock on the prosecutor (not to mention, me).
Skipping over that part, the other words I used were that he has to be carefully investigated and either ruled out or ruled in. There is enough there to qualify for dereliction of duty if the prosecutor were to just laugh it off and slap it away without a very thorough look-see.
I wrote that to you because you had said you didn't know of a single forum member who thought he did it. Since then about 3 or so have bravely admitted they think so, or at least think he COULD have.
I'm in the latter category, and have so stated.
This just came back to mind: nopardons also said in derision against his possible guilt..."have you heard the phone call tape? He sounded insane!" (paraphrase)
I've heard it. I agree he sounded "insane" on the phone call tape.
JonBenet's murderer could not possibly sound so "insane"...was that the point??
Of course he could. That's the realistic point. OF COURSE HE COULD.
"We will call you between 8:00 AM to 10:00 AM about the pickup" makes no sense at all because the sentence implies that he would already have the money by that time. Do you really think you can get $118,000 from an ATM?
The notes says "if you pick up the money earlier"....earlier than when. It's a "garbage" or "nonsense" paragraph EXCEPT for the $118,000 and the "attache case".
You don't need a very big attache case for that amount in those specific bills. Think of a ream of paper. 500-8 1/2"x11" sheets. 6 bills fit on a sheet. $100,000 in $100 dollar bills = 1000/$100 bills....that takes care of 2 of the 6 "spaces" in a 500 sheet ream. There are 4 spaces left.
$18,000 in twenties is 900/$20 bills. That takes up 2 more spaces. There are still two spaces left. Remember, if you are withdrawing that kind of money, it will come in compressed, banded packs and any idiot knows it will be "marked".
Paper bag? Where the hell do you get a paper bag? I haven't used one in YEARS. However, the Ramseys might have paper bags in the house that Karr might have noted on a prior "sneak peak" of the house. He might also have seen an "elaborate" attache case.
So that whole garbage sentence has 3 words that are important: $118,000, attache case, paper bag.
All the paragraphs are the same.
Beheaded refers to John Walsh. I'm sure Karr visited AMW many times.
His southern tie is two-ties. Georgia and the news article of Decemebr 21, 1996 in the Daily camera including a nice picture of John Ramsey.
The dog was at the neighbors and had been there since when?? That's the earliest that Karr could have had access to the house.
Insane is an opinion. He's not doing anything more than pouring his gut out. We've all done it. It's called guilt.