Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Rte66
He didn't give a DNA sample for the misdemeanor child porn charges.

You'd think they'd do that for anyone charged with a sex crime - particularly one involving minors.

1,972 posted on 08/25/2006 12:34:30 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (I wish a political party would come along that thinks like I do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1965 | View Replies ]


To: Tall_Texan

I'm not clear at all what the child porn charges actually involved. They found images on his computer - that's all I know. Were they his - IOW, did he do the porn that's on them? Were they gathered in the course of his "project"?

Someone here said that he sent them to the school district where he worked as some kind of "kiss off" statement, but I sure haven't seen anything like that reported. I was told I was wrong when I said Hutchens turned him in when she taped things and kept track of emails. Just so odd that he was arrested right after she did that.

I ask that because I've followed this case for many years and I've never seen anything like that (porn or child porn) even without a filter, but have heard of others accidentally clicking on a web link and getting into some nasty stuff.

There was an admitted pedophile who posted on one of the JonBenet forums regularly for a long time (ick) and was in one of the Central American countries near where JMK traveled and lived for a couple of years.

He was the first one I thought of when Karr surfaced. I feel certain they probably hooked up somewhere, somehow, but I don't know how far back. Going by Hutchens' timeline of March 2001, that certainly sounds in the realm of possibility.


1,997 posted on 08/25/2006 1:28:41 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1972 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson