maybe D. she had something to do with the the child being missing.
Maybe. But we don't KNOW that, and it seems a terrible thing to speculate about based on nothing but a growing inclination to believe the worst about people. There has been nothing offered to suggest that she wanted to be rid of the child, that she had any history of aberrant behavior, etc., so why jump to the conclusion that this was anything other than a grieving, emotionally distraught young mother?? Because it's more interesting?? Because it makes a better story?? Because those who speculate in this direction are just mean spirited? Don't you think that if she DID do something to the child, it'll be made public soon enough? Why go there at this point? Why can't we just recognize how very, very sad this is for everyone involved and pray for the child's safe return instead of rubbing our hands in glee over the "suspicious" behavior of the mother?