Replies

The usual gang of stubborn damn fools, liberals and "progressives" and other atheists or non-lineal thinkers

You have yet to demonstrate that all who accept the theory of evolution are members of the above categories.

endlessly repeating their mantras of praise of an idjit like Darwin and his crackpot theories,

You have yet to demonstrate that Charles Darwin was an "idjit", not have you demonstrated that his theories are "crackpot". Insulting people will not demonstrate that your assertions are correct.

acked by the utterly corrupt (and taxpayer funded thanks to the usual gang, etc.), gummint edjumakashun establishment,

Please provide evidence to support this claim.

and by "scientific" community convinced that that its members are gods and that God is not (they hope, they hope, they hope),

Please provide evidence to support your claim that members of the scientific community believe themselves to be "gods". Your claim that they "believe that God is not" is demonstratably false, as there exist theist scientists who accept the theory of evolution.

those self-imagined simians who prefer to worship themselves and to ignore the word of God, thereby freeing themselves to do what they damn well please to do regardless of consequences to others and to practice a faux pragmatism released from the bounds imposed by their Creator (whether they acknowledge Him or not).

Your insults and false claims about scientists does not falsify the theory of evolution.

ou can post continued inquiries for the refutation of the Darwinian frankly ridiculous until the cows come home but the most you will get from me is the somewhat disingenuous suggestion that I can accept (for you and others of similar delusion) that you imagine yourselves descended from monkeys, apes, gorillas, chimpanzees, primordial soup suddenly energized by lightning, alien space invaders of limited imagination (most likely as to Darwinists) or from granite rock piles or prehistoric salamanders and to concede that you and your ilk may be right (but only for you and your ilk).

So you admit, then, that you are willfully falsely misrepresenting what I believe and also that you will utterly refuse to provide evidence for your unsubstantiated claimse. If you refuse to provide any reason to show that your assertions are credible and willfully misrepresent the positions of others, why then should anyone believe what you say?

If you find this separation of you from us as to origins to be somehow irrational, remember that I do not actually believe that you and your soulmates are actually descended from baboons or whatever regardless of objective evidence, but if I did believe that, it would be at least competitive with Darwinian delusions in terms of believability.

This does not justify your beligerant refusal to support your claims with evidence, nor does it excuse your insults and misrepresentations.

These delusions of yours, when quarantined or properly ridiculed or even examined, are as harmless as the dopey nephew in the movie Arsenic and Old Lace who keeps on charging up the stairs and blowing his trumpet as though he were Teddy Roosevelt at San Juan Hill.

Please provide evidence that I am delusional. If you cannot, I can only conclude that you are making unwarranted personal attacks against my person.

Oh, and asserting that Darwinism is true does not make it so.

I have never claimed othewise. You are attacking a strawman.

You get Darwin and his tax-funded religion of pseudo-science which needs defense at all costs lest anyone have the opportunity in taxpayer funded brain laundries to consider the obvious alternative that God created the universe, you, me and everything else in it and did so without the assistance of Darwin or or of apes (except in the creation of other apes).

The theory of evolution is not a religion, and it is not honest to claim that it is.

Your long-worded post provides makes a number of personal attacks, but thus far you have provided absolutely no evidence to support your claims. It fact, you have even admitted that you will not provide evidence to support your claims. Based upon the energy that you have expended specifically to refuse to support your unsubstantiated assertions, it seems highly likely that your purpose is to willfully spread falsehoods, such as your continued efforts to falsely equate acceptance of the theory of evolution as valid science with atheism. Your behaviour is clearly irrational and it is not honest. If you are an example of your faith, then I must confess that I have far too much integrity and ethical concerns to allow myself to become as dishonest as your faith apparently requires of its adherents.

D: You have yet to "demonstrate" your capacity to read. Neither Christianity nor Catholicism owes ANYTHING WHATSOEVER by way of argument to Darwinian delusion or other gummint godless religions. Western civilization is NOT based on Darwin come lately. Darwinianism is NOT the standard. It is the obviously irrational challenge to the Judaeo-Christian basis and standard of Western civilization.

One minor concession to your expressed need for evidence. If you don't believe that this Darwinian delusion is the uniform forced curriculum of gummint skewels [in spite of your citation of a pseudo-scientific apologia for Darwinism/attack on Ann Coulter which includes one of many fedcourt decisions (this time from Kansas) cramming Darwinian delusion down the throats of school kids with taxpayer dollars courtesy of the ACLU (law firm of the secular humanists and other materialists and atheists)]. As Coulter wisely observes, the public schools are the madrassas of the radical left.

If there are drivers who think they can drive safely with blood alcohol of 0.40 in urban areas on 70 MPH interstate highways that does not prove that they can. If there are "scientists" who believe in Darwinian delusion, that they are simians and that they believe in God, this proves nothing but rank confusion and that science has abandoned the search for truth in its quest for tax-subsidized hegemony over people who know better than they.

My assertions are credible: Look at Ann. No excessiely furry body. No bananas in hand or mouth. No public rib scratching. One fine looking human female with no outward appearances of apeness or chimapnzeeness or atheism or other form of liberalism. Presto: Ann is, ummmm, magnificently human and monkeys are not. "People" who think otherwise are, ummmmm, at best questionable. If y'all want to believe that y'all are really apes or baboons, hey, enjoy!!!!

The Bible is per se credible. So is the Teaching Magisterium. Darwin is not.

Simian wannabes are not worthy of respect. Their theories are not worthy of respect. The ones who want to split the difference by claiming to be "theists" while also claiming to be descended from monkeys, apes, gorillas, baboons, chimpanzees are saying that they believe in God but reject His word favoring Darwin's delusions instead. Hmmmmm....schizophrenia, anyone?????

BTW, I did not invent the term "descended from..." in this context. If Darwinian obsessives actually were "descended from" other simians as they hallucinate, the term would accurately describe their regression.

I absolutely do not care whether you believe what I say. I concede absolutely nothing to you much less that I am willfully misrepresenting anything much less falsely (wouldn't a false misrepresentation actually be a true representation????....never mind). The suggestion, rather, is that if you are a simian wannabe, you can feel free to be a simian wannabe, for all that I care. My religion is the truth whether you happen to like it or not. You are free in America and in the Catholic dogma as to free will to adopt whatever fantasies turn you on (and to take the consequences of your choices). Far be it from me to interfere with your choice of monkeys as ancestors. OTOH, don't expect me to be impressed.

The theory of evolution and its promoters need no help in thoroughly discrediting evolution. It is a self-executing discreditation and always has been. Go entertain yourself in your little laboratory. Who knows, maybe you will impress you.

I have not "admitted" anything. I have proclaimed Darwinian delusion not to rise to a level deserving respect or evidence in opposition. The burden of proof lies exclusively on the delusionists who are simian wannabes to prove their ancestry lies among the monkeys.

BTW, if you believe that man has an immortal soul, describe how it "evolved" from the mortal soul of apes. Or do you believe that apes have immortal souls????

Simian ancestors or the Truth of Christ???? Ummmmm, the Truth of Christ every time.

As to your last paragraph: "God is dead!"---Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead!"---God! Also: "Darwin is dead!"---God