Take Darwin and place him and his idjit theories where the sun shineth not.
You have yet to demonstrate that the theory of evolution is false. Your claims are presumptious.
And, Godless is, among other things, Ann Coulter's cogent explanation of the hilarious fantasy that is Darwinianism, to you, Bub.
As has been demonstrated, Ann Coulter employs blatant falsehoods in her attacks on the theory of evolution. That you choose to ignore this fact does not negate the reality that her arguments against the theory are not valid.
Wanna drag race with Annie for position on the (gulp) New York Times best-seller list???? You'll lose. On such a list of National Review, Human Events or the American Spectator, you'll lose a lot worse.
The popularity of Ann Coulter's book does not make her invalid arguments any less invalid. You are appealing to a logical fallacy.
Any "science" which purports to refutes the word of God is a rejection of His truth and therefore not part of a search for truth.
If you have decided already that you will reject any aspect of reality that contradicts your religious beliefs, then there is no further purpose for discussion. You have already made it clear that you are arrogant enough to believe that you know God's word better than any other, thus you have demonstrated that you are wholly irrational.
posted on 09/22/2006 11:46:43 AM PDT
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
No further purpose for discussion? Promise or threat? Please make it promise.
posted on 09/22/2006 11:54:04 AM PDT
(Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson