To: Conservative Coulter Fan
The article you just posted was the response that my article successfully rebutted. Your article may have pretty graphs and photographs and even scientific terminology (to a point), but it isn't science. Don't kid yourself.
103 posted on
10/24/2006 2:36:21 PM PDT by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: Alter Kaker
Main Entry:
tau·tol·o·gous Pronunciation:
to-'tä-l&-g&s Function:
adjective Etymology: Greek
tautologos, from
taut- +
legein to say -- more at
LEGEND1 : involving or containing rhetorical
tautology : REDUNDANT2 : true by virtue of its logical form alone
-
tau·tol·o·gous·ly adverb
Tautological statements, such as, "it isn't science," are as ridiculous the fact that I offered a rebuttal to your rebuttal and yet you only recognize the rebuttal you posited...even though you didn't read it or my latter rebuttal to your rebuttal...but you still have this authority that evidence of a young earth isn't science...this is a worthless discussion because you don't need evidence and you are perfectly willing to exclude anything that doesn't conform to widely held beliefs...you lack the slightest skepticism of your own notions of the topic and you are wholly closed to anything outside such notions...therefore you will not be reconciled...good bye.
109 posted on
10/24/2006 2:45:48 PM PDT by
Conservative Coulter Fan
(I am defiantly proud of being part of the Religious Right in America.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson