I posted the rebuttal by Dr. Humphreys to Kevin Henke...given that you googled and came up with Henke's piece. As to having my own arguments...do you have your own arguments? What exactly am I responding to...I thought I was simply trying to show that there is evidence out there to support a creationist theory and it only takes a conditioned prejudice to cause people to automatically reject such a notion and disguise prejudicial language with scientific jargon...it comes down to bombastic laymen. I don't find the argumentation from your side to be that intellectual or noteworthy...there is a guy standing in the store telling me how President Bush is responsible for the rise and fall of gas prices...because he heard...and he heard.
And I posted Henke's counter-rebuttal. Did you even read what I posted before you ran away to Google?
What exactly am I responding to...I thought I was simply trying to show that there is evidence out there to support a creationist theory and it only takes a conditioned prejudice to cause people to automatically reject such a notion and disguise prejudicial language with scientific jargon.
You haven't posted an example of evidence supporting creationism. The Helium stuff is demonstrable pseudo-science masquerading as science designed to impress laymen with big words. But even IF it were true (which it obviously isn't) it would just suggest a different age to the earth. It would NOT be positive evidence in support of creationism.