To: Piefloater
... which included hysterectomy ...
The so-called right-to-death partisans have finally developed an argument that can sway me. Were I this child I would rather die, and die cruelly, than be medically altered for the convenience of my parents.
2 posted on
11/01/2006 4:42:09 PM PST by
Asclepius
(protectionists would outsource our dignity and prosperity in return for illusory job security)
To: Piefloater
Okay, I'm sorry. I know this is a serious story. But for some reason, I saw that headline and Steve Martin's voice started playing in my head...
I'm on drugs. You know what I'm talking about. I like to get small. It's very dangerous for kids, because they get realllly small.
3 posted on
11/01/2006 4:42:16 PM PST by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich!)
To: Piefloater
To: Piefloater
When I read the leader I thought that this would be the kind of pituitary tinkering that would be done in, say, a post-polio situation with a withered leg. All I can really say is... damn.
The hysterectomy is interesting, actually, because if she's as disabled as the article suggests, she's incapable of giving sexual consent. The idea of reproductive rights becomes tangled.
I'd hate to have been on that ethics panel.
5 posted on
11/01/2006 4:46:30 PM PST by
KevinGray
To: Piefloater
By the logic used here, amputating her arms & legs may be next if she remains "unmanageable". And if the woman produces another "defective" child, shouldn't she be forced to have a hysterectomy?
This is incredibly disgusting!
7 posted on
11/01/2006 5:03:28 PM PST by
Mister Da
(The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
To: wagglebee
Major moral absolutes ping (Disgusting)
8 posted on
11/01/2006 5:06:56 PM PST by
darkangel82
(Higher visibility leads to greater zottability.)
To: Piefloater
Who will take care of her when her parents are not able?
9 posted on
11/01/2006 5:07:27 PM PST by
newzjunkey
(Arnold-McClintock / YES 1A, 83, 85, 90 / San Diego: NO A-YES B & C)
To: Piefloater
It would seem that there is now a blurring of the line between children and pets. I could see having a dog or a cat fixed to modify its behavior, but to do so with a human is, at least to me, beyond the pale.
To: Piefloater
So please explain to me just what kind of freaking "ethics" committee this was!
23 posted on
11/01/2006 5:19:44 PM PST by
BlessedBeGod
(Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
To: Piefloater
While I find the situation sad, I don't find it "sickening" at all.
I can't criticize the parents for their decision.
29 posted on
11/01/2006 5:23:42 PM PST by
MMcC
To: Piefloater
Wow what an interesting moral dilemma, I'll have to ponder this a while before formulating an opinion. Looking forward to reading what others have to say.
42 posted on
11/01/2006 5:45:12 PM PST by
Teflonic
To: Piefloater
If the child is so terribly disabled that they will never be able to function or take care of themselves, then I've got no problem leaving such treatment options up to the parents. The hysterectomy, in particular, sounds merely sensible.
82 posted on
11/01/2006 7:26:44 PM PST by
Sloth
(The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
To: Piefloater; All
Is this legal? What ever happen to the Hippocratic oath that doctors have to take that says "Do no harm"?
97 posted on
11/01/2006 8:13:14 PM PST by
SoldierDad
(Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier fighting in Mahmudiyah)
To: Piefloater
Ghastly. Criminal. Obscene. Demonic. Hellish.
A pathetic stunt like this simply beggars the language.
While they're at it, why not fuse her spine and bolt into her back a convenient carrying handle?
[ V O M I T ]
100 posted on
11/01/2006 8:22:00 PM PST by
Petronski
(CNN is an insidiously treasonous, enemy propaganda organ.)
To: Piefloater
141 posted on
11/03/2006 4:11:28 AM PST by
8mmMauser
("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest.")
To: Piefloater
Just put a plastic bag over her head and tape it shut. Why go about something half-assed?
144 posted on
11/07/2006 6:57:36 AM PST by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson