Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/01/2006 4:38:56 PM PST by Piefloater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Piefloater
... which included hysterectomy ...
The so-called right-to-death partisans have finally developed an argument that can sway me. Were I this child I would rather die, and die cruelly, than be medically altered for the convenience of my parents.
2 posted on 11/01/2006 4:42:09 PM PST by Asclepius (protectionists would outsource our dignity and prosperity in return for illusory job security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Piefloater
Okay, I'm sorry. I know this is a serious story. But for some reason, I saw that headline and Steve Martin's voice started playing in my head...

I'm on drugs. You know what I'm talking about. I like to get small. It's very dangerous for kids, because they get realllly small.

3 posted on 11/01/2006 4:42:16 PM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Piefloater

4 posted on 11/01/2006 4:43:21 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Piefloater

When I read the leader I thought that this would be the kind of pituitary tinkering that would be done in, say, a post-polio situation with a withered leg. All I can really say is... damn.

The hysterectomy is interesting, actually, because if she's as disabled as the article suggests, she's incapable of giving sexual consent. The idea of reproductive rights becomes tangled.

I'd hate to have been on that ethics panel.


5 posted on 11/01/2006 4:46:30 PM PST by KevinGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Piefloater
By the logic used here, amputating her arms & legs may be next if she remains "unmanageable". And if the woman produces another "defective" child, shouldn't she be forced to have a hysterectomy?

This is incredibly disgusting!
7 posted on 11/01/2006 5:03:28 PM PST by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Major moral absolutes ping (Disgusting)


8 posted on 11/01/2006 5:06:56 PM PST by darkangel82 (Higher visibility leads to greater zottability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Piefloater

Who will take care of her when her parents are not able?


9 posted on 11/01/2006 5:07:27 PM PST by newzjunkey (Arnold-McClintock / YES 1A, 83, 85, 90 / San Diego: NO A-YES B & C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Piefloater
It would seem that there is now a blurring of the line between children and pets. I could see having a dog or a cat fixed to modify its behavior, but to do so with a human is, at least to me, beyond the pale.
16 posted on 11/01/2006 5:13:28 PM PST by jmcenanly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Piefloater

So please explain to me just what kind of freaking "ethics" committee this was!


23 posted on 11/01/2006 5:19:44 PM PST by BlessedBeGod (Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Piefloater

While I find the situation sad, I don't find it "sickening" at all.

I can't criticize the parents for their decision.


29 posted on 11/01/2006 5:23:42 PM PST by MMcC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Piefloater

Wow what an interesting moral dilemma, I'll have to ponder this a while before formulating an opinion. Looking forward to reading what others have to say.


42 posted on 11/01/2006 5:45:12 PM PST by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Piefloater

If the child is so terribly disabled that they will never be able to function or take care of themselves, then I've got no problem leaving such treatment options up to the parents. The hysterectomy, in particular, sounds merely sensible.


82 posted on 11/01/2006 7:26:44 PM PST by Sloth (The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Piefloater; All
Is this legal? What ever happen to the Hippocratic oath that doctors have to take that says "Do no harm"?
97 posted on 11/01/2006 8:13:14 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier fighting in Mahmudiyah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Piefloater
Ghastly. Criminal. Obscene. Demonic. Hellish.


A pathetic stunt like this simply beggars the language.

While they're at it, why not fuse her spine and bolt into her back a convenient carrying handle?


[ V O M I T ]
100 posted on 11/01/2006 8:22:00 PM PST by Petronski (CNN is an insidiously treasonous, enemy propaganda organ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Piefloater
Pinged from Terri Dailies

8mm


141 posted on 11/03/2006 4:11:28 AM PST by 8mmMauser ("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Piefloater

Just put a plastic bag over her head and tape it shut. Why go about something half-assed?


144 posted on 11/07/2006 6:57:36 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson