Apparently in your opinion, if a person is already stunted, then it is ethically permissible to stunt them even further.
That's like saying that if a person lost one leg, then it is ethically permissible to remove the other.
-A8
If a human adult is little more than vegative and infantile, you can take off both armes and legs as far as I am concerned.
That’s like saying that if a person lost one leg, then it is ethically permissible to remove the other.
If it is a management issue and the poor soul doesnt realize what is going on, what difference would it make?