The girl is now six years old. Of course there will come a day when they can't move her. Nobody disagrees with *that*. The problem is doing something unethical (i.e. stunting the girl's growth) in order to extend the time before that happens.
I'm not positive that it is unethical. Is it more or less ethical than the hysterectomy (which I do support)?
Then why wouldn't you do it to a child with 'normal' intelligence?
-A8
81 posted on 11/01/2006 7:21:53 PM PST by adiaireton8
("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)