To: NonValueAdded
Positive? Like if he had quit a month ago, the Republicans would have likely held on to the Senate? Is that positive enough for you?
7 posted on
11/08/2006 10:14:04 AM PST by
tyke
To: tyke
I agree. If he was going to resign, it should have been before the election.
To: tyke; NonValueAdded
Didn't take long to run across some self-centered, blathering idiot intent on ruining this tribute to a decent, highly competent public servant who has made us all safer.
I join you, NVA, in extending my sincere appreciation to the best SecDef in my lifetime, bar none.
22 posted on
11/08/2006 10:19:07 AM PST by
Coop
(FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
To: tyke
"Positive? Like if he had quit a month ago, the Republicans would have likely held on to the Senate? Is that positive enough for you?"
I'm positive you're right.
36 posted on
11/08/2006 10:23:01 AM PST by
brownsfan
(It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
To: tyke
>>>
Positive? Like if he had quit a month ago, the Republicans would have likely held on to the Senate? Is that positive enough for you?<<< Bush answered that in his news conference 5 minutes ago.
Announcing a change prior to the election would have sent a message to the troops that he was willing to sacrifice the leadership he had chosen for them, and that he had backed strongly for the sake of political expediency.
Bush is a man that will not sacrifice principle for political gain.....I like that. You may feel differently.
71 posted on
11/08/2006 10:37:47 AM PST by
HardStarboard
(Hey illegals, march some more - its helping get the wall built!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson