Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Echo Talon
To add even more insult to injury the slowest Core 2 Duo in the test, the 1.86GHz E6300 is barely slower than AMD's fastest Athlon 64 X2. Please look at the first chart and read under it

OK, I already granted you that the FX line is overpriced. That's given.

The E6300 is barely slower than the FX 62, but it's also barely faster (sometimes) than the equally-priced 64 X2 4200+ (see the next chart after the one you pointed out)

This supports my contention that at or below the E6300 / X2 4200+ price ($182), the Athlon is still a perfectly good choice for a home computer.

...and the Core2 motherboards still cost more.

88 posted on 11/30/2006 1:44:05 PM PST by TChris (We scoff at honor and are shocked to find traitors among us. - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: TChris
..and the Core2 motherboards still cost more.

GIGABYTE GA-945P-S3 Socket T (LGA 775) Intel 945P ATX Intel Motherboard - Retail $90.99

I don't think thats very expensive for a motherboard...

PCI Express x16
PCI Express x1 (3)
PCI Slots (3)
Number of DDR2 Slots 4 x 240pin
8 Channel Audio
Gigabit Lan
4 X SATA 3Gb/s
8 X USB 2.0

Not the greatest but if he's NOT going to overclock... its not terribly expensive, and should he choose to it will still allow for some overclocking...

94 posted on 11/30/2006 10:01:10 PM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson