“”””and totally off topic: where did she chop him up?”””
Did LE check that storage unit they rented?
I always suspected that while he was drugged up (with the chloral hydrate) she fooled him into thinking she was taking him to a hospital then drove him to the storage unit and shot him. Remember, the suitcases were in the storage unit.
She then went back to the house to put his clothes in the garbage bags and took some extra garbage bags with her.
He bled out from the gunshot wounds. Then she dismembered the body with power tools that were also in the storage unit - put him in the suitcases and drove to the Chesapeake bay.
In the deaths of Daniel and ANS - too many coincidences and too much circumstantial evidence pointing to HKS. As mentioned today in the nurse's case, circumstantial evidence can be more powerful that direct evidence.
This is an UNBELIEVABLE story that will be a movie. Her attorney could have done more to make her look sympathetic. IMO, she came off as cold-hearted...
They never checked the storage unit for blood?
If the prosecutors and LE did not THOROUGHLY check that storage unit (esp considering the suitcases and gun WERE in there at one time), then they are inept idiots! I didn’t read or hear anything about them checking the storage unit though. Although, I believe she is guilty (but only with an accomplice), I do NOT think the prosecution presented a case against her ‘without reasonable doubt’...Of course, that’s just my opinion. I still believe she is guilty, but I do NOT believe she did it ALONE. On another case, I think the preacher’s wife GOT OFF way too easy, mainly bc her ‘claim’ of ABUSE, was NOTHING compared to some I’ve seen with my own two eyes, not to mention the cases I’ve read about...again JMO...but it is funny (ODD) to have two cases of a woman on trial (in one week) for killing her husband, and to see the totally DIFFERENT outcomes! (Although, the fact that one husband was ‘butchered’ and disposed of in suitcases, could HARDLY BE IGNORED, and was absolutely heinous!!)