Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freeper Review: “Incredible” Values Shine Through In Pixar’s “Ratatouille”
June 29, 2007 | L.N. Smithee

Posted on 06/29/2007 7:46:33 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee

SPOILER ALERT!

Ratatouille, a Pixar Animation Studios film distributed by the Walt Disney Company, is about a rat that wants to be a French chef. It doesn’t sound impressive, and on its face doesn’t seem like something that would come out of Pixar, which has a twelve-year winning streak (Toy Story, A Bug’s Life, Toy Story 2, Monsters, Inc., Finding Nemo, The Incredibles, and Cars) made more remarkable by the nation’s declining interest in anything other than the biggest-budgeted Hollywood blockbusters – and, of course, their inevitable (and seemingly endless) sequels.

Personally, I had a touch of skepticism about Ratatouille dating all the way back to when the first trailer was shown before Pixar’s last feature, Cars. “How in the world can a Pixar-quality film be made about a cooking rat?” I thought to myself. And which came first, the punny title, or the story? It had the sound of a script treatment that was written on a napkin, and later greenlighted in a cable cartoon network’s boardroom after a wine malt liquor-tasting. How else would the world have been given Aqua Teen Hunger Force or My Gym Partner Is a Monkey?

I was already having enough trouble swallowing Cars as a Pixar-worthy effort. Animated automobiles with eyes and mouths? That’s an idea as old as the hills in the backgrounds of Steamboat Willie -- every TV watcher within one hundred miles of a Chevron station has seen enough cute talking animated cars to last the rest of their lives. On top of that, the story line of Cars was pedestrian (sorry) and clichéd. One wonders if everyone at Pixar who worked on Cars would dare swear they had never seen Doc Hollywood, a 1991 Michael J. Fox vehicle (sorry again) with an almost identical concept: Arrogant Eastern U.S.-dwelling whiz kid on the road to money and glory in California takes a wrong turn and suffers a smash-up in the sticks. He is stranded, and the sticks’ hicks refuse to let him out of town until he’s done something to help them. Eventually, he learns the true meanings of humility, friendship, and (of course) love. Been there, seen that. In the end, the success of Cars depended solely on the talent-rich Pixar team’s deep reservoir of visual creativity. Cars worked in spite of itself, but it was a close call.

Easing my fears Pixar’s status as standard-bearer of family entertainment was in danger was the news Brad Bird was entrusted with writing and directing Ratatouille after original creator Jan Pinkava – according to published reports – couldn’t really make the story he conceptualized “work.” Bird was the writer and director of The Incredibles, which won 2004’s Academy Award for Animated Feature.

Unlike Ratatouille, The Incredibles was a high-concept winner from the beginning: The Parrs, an everyday suburban nuclear family of five, have a secret; four of them have superpowers. The father and mother – each having been issued secret identities by the government many years prior – emerge from forced retirement and enlist their two oldest youngsters and another heroic family friend to help save the world. But before battling any bad guys, the superpapa has to win his personal battle of the bulge, his gut having stretched beyond the contraints of his old costume.

Sounds like a hoot. But Bird wasn’t content serving up empty laughs.

A genuinely thrilling action comedy that just happened to be lushly animated, The Incredibles made subtle statements about family life, mid-life crises, and personality changes in children as they grow (consider the powers each Parr family member had). Bird also took scalpel-precision aim at megamillion-dollar deep-pockets lawsuits, deep-pocketed corporations that deliberately create unnecessary red tape just to extract profits from loyal customers, and, most of all, a culture in which personal achievement that benefits society at large is discouraged to protect the oh-so-important feelings of people who can’t measure up. And Bird did all of this while being funny as all-get-out.

(If you didn’t view the The Incredibles DVD, here’s something you don’t know: Bird – a married father – originally conceived the opening scene of the film to highlight a backyard barbecue confrontation between Helen Parr (formerly superheroine Elastigirl) and a snooty professional neighbor woman who spoke with dripping disdain about Helen’s choice to be a stay-at-home mom.)

Similarly, with Bird’s Ratatouille, there is much more to it than one can display in a thirty-second ad. Here’s the short version: Young Remy, the rodent protagonist, has more refined tastes than those in his native colony, which is led by his father. He’s not content to eat discarded mystery slop, and rather than forage through rubbish for sustenance, he aspires to get the good stuff – fresh food from inside human dwellings. Although he experiences twinges of guilt for stealing, he manages to grab enough grub to develop a love for combining foods and spices to create new taste sensations.

After a series of events results in Remy’s separation from the colony during a rainstorm with only his favorite cookbook (Anyone Can Cook) to keep him company, he discovers that he has washed up in the sewers of Paris, the home of his favorite chef, the cookbook’s internationally acclaimed author. He heads for the restaurant the chef left behind after his death, and longingly looks through a kitchen window. He is horrified as he sees a newly-hired janitor (with his own epicurean aspirations) ruin a soup by adding the wrong ingredients. Remy sneaks into through the window and fixes the soup, but is captured by the janitor, who perceives that Remy is a better chef than he is. They develop a system that allows Remy to pull the strings for the janitor, who is promoted when patrons rave about his cooking under Remy’s tutelage. I don’t want to give away too much, but suffice to say that before the movie ends, there is romance, betrayal, jealousy, intrigue, madness, tension, revelation, and triumph, with hilarity throughout. (This is not to mention the Pixar family’s reinforcing their reputation for attention to detail in every frame, suitable for hanging.)

But what’s most remarkable about Ratatouille is the way that Brad Bird fuses entertainment and social statement in such a seamless way. Bird gets in short but sharp digs at mindless merchandising (which I believe could have been at least partially inspired by Pixar’s near-divorce from Disney) and, shockingly, the entire concept of the professional critic – a risky thing for a filmmaker to do since he is so dependent on their approval. Most impressive of all is the way Bird deals with the overall theme of what President Bush has referred to as “the soft bigotry of low expectations.” It is my opinion is that if you aren’t too young to comprehend the lessons in scenes in which Remy’s father, family and friends beg him to leave the restaurant, return to the colony, and just accept that they are all “just” rats, you will marvel that they are delivered like a parental tap on the shoulder, not an Aaron Sorkinesque punch in the nose.

The ending is surprising in some ways – it is unlikely you will expect the way it exactly happens – but it is a happy one. It is, of course, a Pixar picture, one suitable for the entire family. I don’t have a family, but if I did, I would take it, and have a discussion about it over dinner. Perhaps the kids could help make dinner. After all, “Anyone Can Cook.”


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: moviereview; pixar; ratatouille; whocares
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: L.N. Smithee

I agree with you about the the soft bigotry of low expectations. In fact, I thought the rats refer to the Black community who always said, ‘we are diffeent from them’...


41 posted on 06/30/2007 2:59:49 AM PDT by paudio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
I was disappointed in this movie. IMO it’s the weakest Pixar so far. The middle part exchanges slapstick for plot (boring) and then we get a major plot device, illegitimacy. I did enjoy the end but it was too little too late.
42 posted on 06/30/2007 5:29:20 AM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Varda
The middle part exchanges slapstick for plot (boring)

Oh, my heavens, slapstick in an animated comedy?! You didn't walk into the theater it thinking it was a Merchant-Ivory film, did you?

and then we get a major plot device, illegitimacy.

IMHO, that's a very strange way to look at it unless you're trying to pick it apart.

43 posted on 06/30/2007 10:53:22 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Has George W. Bush been taking Carter's Little Pills?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: paudio
I agree with you about the the soft bigotry of low expectations. In fact, I thought the rats refer to the Black community who always said, ‘we are [different] from them’...

As a black man, I had that same reaction when Remy's father took him to look up at the exterminator's window display. So many black "leaders" reference historical pen-and-ink illustrations and black-and-white photographs of lynchings.

44 posted on 06/30/2007 12:39:12 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Has George W. Bush been taking Carter's Little Pills?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Pixars haven’t previously indulged in a great deal of slapstick. I’m not a slapstick fan. It has it’s place and is better in measured doses. The opening cartoon was slapstick too. The middle slapstick scenes lasted too long. The kids in the theater liked it for awhile but even they turned quiet eventually.
I was surprised by the illegitimacy angle. Especially in the context of a protagonists mother. The movie description of her was that she professed belief in heaven, was publicly known as the Chefs lover and was keeping knowledge of the father and son from each other. If you think that’s being picky then I’m picky. I found it odd and disturbing in the presence of so many pre-schoolers in the audience.
45 posted on 06/30/2007 2:53:17 PM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Varda
The middle slapstick scenes lasted too long. The kids in the theater liked it for awhile but even they turned quiet eventually...

I was surprised by the illegitimacy angle. Especially in the context of a protagonists mother. The movie description of her was that she professed belief in heaven, was publicly known as the Chefs lover and was keeping knowledge of the father and son from each other. If you think that’s being picky then I’m picky. I found it odd and disturbing in the presence of so many pre-schoolers in the audience.

Hold on -- are you still talking about the pre-schoolers who were bored by the slapstick? They're going to pick up on Linguini being 'illegitimate'? And let's be honest, shall we? How many of the kids in the theater do you think shared that distinction?

In case you haven't noticed, we now live in a different age. If you were somehow hoping that Ratatouille would be something like a VeggieTales movie with Sunday School themes because it's rated "G," sorry! You were wrong.

If Linguini and Colette's relationship was implied to have rapidly progressed beyond a kiss and a scooter ride, that would have been worrisome. But the only times we saw either of them in bed, each was alone.

46 posted on 06/30/2007 3:35:45 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Has George W. Bush been taking Carter's Little Pills?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Just got back from seeing it... with three other adults, and a total of ten children.

I loved it, found it absolutely splendid -- inspiring and entertaining.

We saw it after waiting in a long line at the hipper-than-thou Alamo Drafthouse Theater, which also had a line, albeit muchmuch shorter, for Sicko. When we exited, there was another huge line for the next showing of Ratatoiulle... and only a handful of children were in it. Very interesting.

(On a side note: there was a guy in the front of the lobby with a basket of pet rats. The kids were fighting to hold them, and even I couldn't resist picking one up and playing with it. Very sweet little animal. Maybe it was the pint of Stella Artois I had, or maybe the flick succeeded in making the normally offensive absolutely irresistible.)

= )

47 posted on 07/01/2007 5:12:55 PM PDT by AnnaZ (I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

I saw it last week...in French! Terrific movie and the French audience APPLAUDED when it was over!!!

As for the cleanliness issue, I think Bird DID address it by making sure that Rémy washed his paws before cooking and hilariously washing his whole clan in the industrial dishwasher before he sets them to work in the kitchen. LOL

Vive Rémy!


48 posted on 08/10/2007 5:10:25 PM PDT by Everydayiwritethebook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: agrace; AnnaZ; Everydayiwritethebook

BEST ANIMATED FEATURE!


Congratulations, Pixar!
Congratulations, Brad Bird, on your second Best Animated Feature win!


49 posted on 02/24/2008 8:22:02 PM PST by L.N. Smithee (There's N-O-T-H-I-N-G About Barry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson