Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge

Just looking for the silver lining in this whole disturbing mess, but at least Jamie Lynne is not killing the child. It would have been very easy to get rid of this problem, at least she’s doing the right thing, not the easy thing.


23 posted on 12/19/2007 12:54:55 PM PST by garv (Conservatism in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: garv

That’s what I was thinking; this probably happens more often than is reported, but a quick application of the suck-o-matic keeps it all on the down-low.


28 posted on 12/19/2007 1:45:02 PM PST by LongElegantLegs (Kill them with kindness, then taser them for fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: garv

Just because I oppose abortion doesn’t mean I have to look on the bright side when a high-profile sixteen year old gets pregnant and sells her story to OK magazine. Jamie Lynn Spears’s very young age and celebrity status will lead to imitators whose pregnancies will end in out-of-wedlock pregnancies AND abortions. In light of this, I find no consolation in the fact that JLS did not choose abortion.


33 posted on 12/20/2007 4:23:32 AM PST by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson