Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AMD Octal core processors for 2009
2CPU ^ | 2007-12-14 20:30:04 | ReMeDy

Posted on 12/26/2007 6:48:37 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

News Source: EEtimes.com

The long awaited Barcelona launched in September of this year and may not have lived up to the hype the company made it out to be. However, the beat must go on and that is exactly what Advanced Micro Devices plans on doing. The talk of Octal core processors have uttered since AMD and their rival have been launching Dual core platforms a few years ago. However, an Octal core server product has been mentioned for the year of '09. Codenamed: Montreal. Bundled with a new platform, Piranha, that will introduce DDR3 DRAM support and HT 3.0 as well.

Read.






TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: hitech

1 posted on 12/26/2007 6:48:38 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

and a new category of microprocessor that combines a general purpose CPU with an accelerator designed for specific market segments.


2 posted on 12/26/2007 6:49:34 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

*drools idly*


3 posted on 12/26/2007 6:54:30 PM PST by Crazieman (The Democrat Party: Culture of Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Three questions from somebody who knows enough to sound intelligent at a cocktail party (and after a minimum of two cocktails): 1. I know there are quad core chips out there but are there any end user applications for them, or are they just used for servers, etc.

2. Will quad core or Octal core make any difference if we are using a 32 bit operating system? In other words, will I/we need to upgrade to Vista x 64 at some point?

3. Intuitively, it seem like the complexity of writing code for multiple core chips would increase geometrically, since you have to have all the cores processing simultaneously. Is this true?

Thank you.

4 posted on 12/26/2007 8:51:08 PM PST by eeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeman
A web browser has some capability to utilize more than one processor....all of my machines are AMD X2...and thus while looking at web sites that have all of those Flash ads going one of the processors can be handling that....makes your processing smoother.

JAVA seems to be a new programming language that has capability to reduce the complexity of writing multiprocessing
code.

Multiprocessing code can be 32 bit.

5 posted on 12/26/2007 9:53:54 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

6 posted on 12/27/2007 12:17:52 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeman
1. I know there are quad core chips out there but are there any end user applications for them, or are they just used for servers, etc.

Yes, and not just the professional ones. My little $25 video converter uses as many cores as you can throw at it (and it'll use the cores of any Mac in your home over the network). Plus running multiple programs lets the OS juggle applications between cores. And on Windows there's all the anti-virus, anti-spyware, DRM system, etc., that can use the extra cores so they don't interfere so much with the application you're using.

But you do have to worry about your OS if you're using Windows. While any version of Vista will recognize all the cores on one processor, only the higher-end versions will recognize multiple processors, the rest are artificially limited.

2. Will quad core or Octal core make any difference if we are using a 32 bit operating system? In other words, will I/we need to upgrade to Vista x 64 at some point?

Yes. You still get access to all the cores.

3. Intuitively, it seem like the complexity of writing code for multiple core chips would increase geometrically

Some might say logarithmically. It is harder, and debugging can be orders of magnitude harder since errors can be very sporadic with little evidence of what's causing them.

Most Windows programmers have been used to limited multithreading (the main mechanism for multi-processor programming) for years, as that's the only way to keep the user interface responsive. Lack of this is often why you see "Application Not Responding," the app is busy working and not using another thread to respond to user interface requests. But this is different from taking one big job and distributing it among multiple threads, or even harder, multiple different jobs that interact with each other.

But languages are starting to make it easier to program for multiple threads. There are libraries out there that can help programmers manage their threads. There are compilers that will both/either optimize your program for multiple cores and catch potential errors before they occur. The Microsoft .NET runtime automatically manages a pool of threads for you (evens the load, reduces overhead of creating threads, prevents you from creating too many that may bog down the system). And then there's Apple's OS X, where a call to various functions even in a single-threaded application automatically multithreads.

7 posted on 12/27/2007 12:49:18 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eeman; antiRepublicrat
In the rarified world of HPC (High Performance Computing), where most applications run on the Linux OS, the multiple CPU cores are even today being used by multi-threaded application programs. These programs spawn multiple threads (or processes) each of which can run on a separate core. Thus, with a multi-threaded version of a program that can exploit all 8 cores, you can have a huge performance boost compared to the single-threaded version of that same software.

Of course, writing and optimizing a multi-threaded application is not trivial, as in some cases, resource contentions can cause unintended performance degradation.

8 posted on 12/27/2007 2:18:38 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson