Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roger Clemens' Tall Tales
National Post [Canada] ^ | Thursday, January 10, 2008 | Frank Deford

Posted on 01/10/2008 8:35:18 AM PST by canuck_conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: WL-law

Let me say it another way — speaking as someone who knows everything about the Duke rape case, the truth is that “This smells NOTHING AT ALL LIKE the Duke Rape case journalism.

Nobody knows everything about the Duke Rape case, except God.

WL law knows everything about the Duke Rape case.

Therefore, WL Law is God.


41 posted on 01/10/2008 5:56:11 PM PST by DOGEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

Let’s be honest. Clemens is ALWAYS angry.


42 posted on 01/10/2008 7:39:06 PM PST by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Think if the Babe had steroids instead of beer

Instead of 550 ft homers they would have been 650footers


43 posted on 01/11/2008 6:33:44 AM PST by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

Who is more scuzzy, Clemens and McNamee? To me it’s a toss-up. They deserve it each other! (Kinda like Hill and Billary!)


44 posted on 02/12/2008 7:15:24 AM PST by MoreGovLess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess

Truly, I’m still as “befuzzled” about this as I was when I wrote that a month ago.

LOL at the syringes and bloody gauze “proof” - aaacck! I *almost* agree with Rusty Hardin - who keeps stuff like that for years and years? But far be it from me to just fall in line with *him* on that. It’s just that when he calls it a set-up from the get-go, it *does* look that way.

But then, when McNamee added the wife into the mix and how she was prepping for the SI Swimsuit issue (or something like that), I thought surely that has to be true - that’s too many witnesses to have to overcome.

And *then,* the party thing - with someone (Conseco maybe?) calling up and saying there was no way Clemens was at that party 8 years ago (or however long ago it was) - that didn’t seem believable.

As of now, Clemens is supposed to testify tomorrow - then we’ll have more weird stuff to weigh and ponder, I’m sure, lol. So, yeah, *scuzzy and scuzzier* seems to fit, but I’m not happy about it.


45 posted on 02/12/2008 7:30:30 AM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

I can only think of two explanations for the needles and gauze
1. It’s fake
2. Future blackmail opportunity

The “I kept it b/c Roger might roll on me later” part does not seem plausible.

Either way, who needs friends like McNamee? Yuck!


46 posted on 02/12/2008 9:25:53 AM PST by MoreGovLess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess

Heh heh, *as the worm turns.* Guess you’ve heard the overnight news - Pettitte has rolled on Clemens.

But, it’s just a semi-roll ... he claims Clemens talked to him about having taken HGH, but then several years later, took it back and said AnPet misunderstood and it was Roger’s *wife* who took the HGH, for the SI swimsuit photos.

Today *should* tell the tale - but I bet it doesn’t!


47 posted on 02/13/2008 5:36:25 AM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson