Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

What was Snipes’ defense?


18 posted on 02/01/2008 2:36:28 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Benedict Arnold was against the Terrorist Surveillance Program)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VeniVidiVici

He was not ALLOWED to present he defense he wanted to....only an abridged version.


19 posted on 02/01/2008 2:38:52 PM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: VeniVidiVici
What was Snipes’ defense?

From the New York Times article on the case:

"In closing arguments on Tuesday, lawyers for Mr. Snipes sought to portray him as a well-intended victim of bad advice by his co-defendants. They called his tax theories “kooky,” “crazy” and “dead wrong,” but said acting on these views did not make him a criminal because he disclosed his actions. The defense also objected to his being tried by an all-white jury of seven women and five men.

"The Supreme Court has ruled that tax deniers can demonstrate the absence of criminal intent by asserting that they “sincerely believe” that they are not required to pay taxes, although they cannot escape the levies."

29 posted on 02/01/2008 3:27:03 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: VeniVidiVici

I heard on the radio that he presented no defense only stated the government had not proved its case.


32 posted on 02/01/2008 3:47:31 PM PST by scottteng (Proud parent of a Life scout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson