Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Goodell would give indemnification to Walsh for materials from Pats' days
ESPN.com ^ | Chris Mortensen

Posted on 02/07/2008 7:13:44 AM PST by FishTale

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said Wednesday at the Pro Bowl that the NFL is willing to give former Patriots video assistant Matt Walsh legal indemnification for any information and materials he would provide to the league regarding his work with the Patriots.

(Excerpt) Read more at sports.espn.go.com ...


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: cheaters; giants; nfl; patriots
Just hope Mr. Walsh is smart enough to make copies of his "evidence" before he turns it over to Roger.
1 posted on 02/07/2008 7:13:46 AM PST by FishTale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FishTale

I always like the race where the dead horse wins.

Time to move on.


2 posted on 02/07/2008 7:16:44 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FishTale

What does that mean? They won’t fine or penalize him (Walsh) if he spills the beans about Pats taping?


3 posted on 02/07/2008 7:17:01 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FishTale

I just hope if it’s been found out that Belicheck’s been cheating that he be banned from the NFL.

After his sore loser attitude on Sunday, it’s given me more reason to not like the guy.


4 posted on 02/07/2008 7:18:41 AM PST by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

Supposedly, the reason that Walsh won’t talk is that he has a non-disclosure agreement with the Patriots. This means that if he gets sued for revealing what he knows about taping, then the NFL will pay his legal fees and damage awards, if any.


5 posted on 02/07/2008 7:21:59 AM PST by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
Time to move on.

Hmmm. That phrase sounds familiar. Where have we heard that before?

If he has new evidence, then this isn't a dead horse.

6 posted on 02/07/2008 7:23:37 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

This Walsh fellow has not spoken out because he had been told by his attorney that the NFL or the Patriots could come after him for possession of stolen property, breach of contract (if he had a speak-no-evil clause in his contract) etc...

The NFL is saying that they will insure against any “losses” he may incur as a result of his blowing the whistle on the Patriots.


7 posted on 02/07/2008 7:32:41 AM PST by FishTale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Publius Valerius; FishTale

Thanks for the explanation.


8 posted on 02/07/2008 7:49:20 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson