[hellbender]

Notice that the article merely "catalogues" differences, it does not prove anything about the process which led to those differences. That would require DNA from all the purported ancestral forms going back to the postulated common ancestor of chimps and human beings. The article actually assumes evolution, it provides no new proof.

[Soliton]

Notice that the article merely "catalogues" differences, it does not prove anything about the process which led to those differences.

The article explains the types of genetic changes too. We know how those changes occur. Theoretically we could backtrack reversing those changes and recreate our common ancestor with chimpanzees. They will some day.