Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems WILL regret saying Sarah was NOT pregnant!!
8-31-08 | RCA2000

Posted on 08/30/2008 10:34:44 PM PDT by Rca2000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: Rca2000
Checkmate

Blogger here reports seeing a very pregnant Sarah Palin in april. Game over libtards.

61 posted on 08/31/2008 1:45:39 AM PDT by bad company (How much easier is self-sacrifice than self-realization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000

I wouldn’t get too worked up over this.

It’s so absurd that the only people it makes look bad are the people spreading this story. It will disgust any normal person.

We should just ignore it. It doesn’t even dignify a response, to respond to it in any way would lend it more credence than it deserves.


62 posted on 08/31/2008 1:46:30 AM PDT by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000
Feh.

I'll bet she and Todd are ready to fix that anytime:

Cheers!

63 posted on 08/31/2008 5:40:50 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000

This is the stupidest “smear” I have ever heard of before. First, because it is so obviously and provably false, but second, because even if it WERE true, it would not make Palin look bad anyway! Adopting her disabled grandchild would be a responsible act, no matter whether her daughter had behaved stupidly or was a victim, it still would be a good deed on Palin’s part so why would anyone care about this. Good grief.


64 posted on 08/31/2008 7:26:58 AM PDT by CatherinePPP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carlucci

I have noticed that the moonbats often confuse movies and TV shows with reality.


65 posted on 08/31/2008 8:38:08 AM PDT by beckysueb (Drill here! Drill now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

“You do know the entire text was NOT from me, but from someone on the DU?”

yes, I knew that - I’m just still new enough to this board that I didn’t know how else to post a reply - sorry :-)))


66 posted on 08/31/2008 8:50:27 AM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: llandres

Not a problem. Gotta be careful quoting liberals, sometimes people mistake their words for your own.


67 posted on 08/31/2008 9:10:57 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
From DU poster: I personally believe that a fetus is not yet conscious, nor a human being yet. so that’s why I’m pro-choice.

Declaring this after mentioning the "baby's body", its DNA and its blood-type doesn't even make any sense. Does he/she think the DNA is not that of a human? Does he know that pre-born infants have sleep/waking periods that are different levels of consciousness?

According to this poster, it should be legal to violently murder anyone who is unconscious and has different DNA than their mother.

This is another fine example of typical liberal reasoning. They have absolutely no critical thinking skills.

68 posted on 08/31/2008 10:49:24 AM PDT by taraytarah (Nobama/Nobiden/Noway/Noho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: taraytarah
Does he/she think the DNA is not that of a human? Does he know that pre-born infants have sleep/waking periods that are different levels of consciousness?

It doesn't matter. He is trying to justify in his shallow mind the reasoning for killing an unborn baby

Deep thought is not permitted, as it will only lead to concluding that he is wrong.

69 posted on 08/31/2008 10:52:36 AM PDT by airborne (Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: HelloooClareece

Really! Don’t they realize how terrible this must be for the daughter, who is still in state of shock that her mother was selected as a VP candidate?


70 posted on 08/31/2008 11:11:05 AM PDT by keats5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

“Not a problem. Gotta be careful quoting liberals, sometimes people mistake their words for your own.”

what I try to do with my replies (same with emails) is put a line or two of what I’m responding to, in quotes at the top, so that it references what the previous post contained (since these things end up, often, in random order in a given thread.)


71 posted on 08/31/2008 11:13:34 AM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: politicket

“In regards to their eldest son, he is 18 y.o. The Palin’s just celebrated their 20th wedding anniversary on Friday.”

Oh, but don’t you know, it takes Republicans two years to birth baby- cause they’re elephants.


72 posted on 08/31/2008 11:15:17 AM PDT by keats5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ducdriver

It also makes more sense that the baby would be Sarah’s. One of the major risks of a late-in-life preganacy is Down’s Syndrome.


73 posted on 08/31/2008 11:20:34 AM PDT by keats5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: keats5

I remember being so self conscious at that age. Now she has to worry what half the country thinks about her.

I hope Sarah smacks them all down hard. I have a feeling she will and that it will be ugly. This can only hurt Obama’s chances in the end for his side’s smearing of this poor girl and this fine woman.


74 posted on 08/31/2008 12:14:59 PM PDT by HelloooClareece ("We make war that we may live in peace". Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

I said most of us LOL! Not I!


75 posted on 08/31/2008 12:59:13 PM PDT by ducdriver (Quantum potes tantum aude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Tramonto

Very interesting. If I’m figuring this correctly, Jackson would have been 1/8 black - Just like The One. (Assuming this is all true.)


76 posted on 08/31/2008 1:06:32 PM PDT by ducdriver (Quantum potes tantum aude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority

Q. I am borrowing this post and sticking it on alan colmes web site.


77 posted on 08/31/2008 1:13:53 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000

From what little I know I don’t believe she has lobtomised any of her family or drowned anyone in her car. I do know she has more experience as CEO of a government that Obamie. She also has a true love for her country.


78 posted on 08/31/2008 1:15:06 PM PDT by GOYAKLA (My Tee shirt for 2009-2012:" I voted FRED don't you wish you did")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000

There a troll of FR who has been supporting the same lie.


79 posted on 08/31/2008 1:15:25 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ducdriver
Very interesting. If I’m figuring this correctly, Jackson would have been 1/8 black - Just like The One. (Assuming this is all true.)

I don't know if it is true or not but it doesn't relevant except as an internet rumor. Its kind of funny though. I wonder if we can get someone at msnbc to investigate this.

80 posted on 08/31/2008 1:23:56 PM PDT by Tramonto (0bama-Biden: Brite Artikulit Clean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson