Posted on 10/03/2008 11:45:01 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
And still my original question goes unanswered: How does an organism divide functions into two different organisms which rely on each other? And which must keep pace with each other during the alleged "evolutionary" life of any given species. One organism is genetically independent from the other, yet totally dependent upon the other for reproduction. This amounts to an amazing amount of complexity. Each organism must "evolve" part, but not all, of the functionality. And to reproduce that functionality would have to be there from the beginning, or it would not be able to reproduce to respond to the "selective pressure" that is allegedly "applied by the environment."
It’s infuriating when liberals advance the idea that simply impregnating females is all that matters in human survival.
It ignores the most obvious difference between humans and the rest of creation: Our long, long period of helplessness. Animals can either move or defend themselves within days of being born, while humans are more or less helpless for a couple of years. What this means is that two-parent care is vitally important for humans—at least as important as impregnation itself. Animal fathers may impregnate and run, but if human fathers acted that way throughout history, the human race would not exist. We would all have been literally devoured by wolves.
Your insistence that they had to develop separately has no basis.
Do you honestly believe this...of every bisexual species on earth? Really? And where is the evidence for this absurd assertion?
In the journal I sourced, in hermaprhoditic species still extant upon the earth, and in our own DNA and development in that we start out as hermaphrodites.
You know nothing about the subject and yet insist sexual organs had to develop seperately, completely ignoring that the earliest sexually reproducing organisms we know of are all hermaphrodite.
And then you are incredulous about it.
Funny! ;)
What you acknowledge that...
2. ...in every instance of a species reproducing by means of heterosexual activity, there are two different individuals required: a male and a female?
2. ...if there are two different individuals, even if at some point there was only one (which I do not accept), at some further point, the one had to divide into two?
3. ...that there would need to be some change after the two divided: loss of at least part of the function being carried on by the other?
4. ...that in every instance of heterosexual reproduction, both individuals would have to be fully functional in order for any off spring to carry on the “evolution”?
5. ...that your journal has not explained how that happened, when it happened, or even that it actually happened?
You are wrong and now your just being silly about it.
Learn something.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2098021/posts
Gender-Bending Barnacles Grow Huge Penises in Rough Waters
Apart from intervention by God we are destined to have greater and greater amounts of genetic mistakes and problems, eventually disappearing from existence. Thank God, this will not happen due to Christ's return, bringing the renewing of all things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.