I posted extensively on the fact that as I listened to Barack Obama speak at the Democrat convention in 2004, I was at first attracted to his style, but it wasn’t long before I noticed a discomforting familiarity that I couldn’t place, something about the cadence and the use of emotional buzz words. Then I realized, he sounded just Marjoe Goertner, the boy evangelist, the fraudulent tent preacher and healer.
When I posted this, some Freepers pointed out that it was a favored technique of the Nazis also. I did a search on mind control and Nazis and sure enough, they were right.
I begin to believe that I am very fortunate that I have read transcripts but have not listened to his speeches live.
I couldnt’ understand why people rave about his eloquence because he is repetitive and irrational.
The article hi-lights the irrational logic leaps in Obama’s speech that I can never make but that causes others to swoon, faint, excuse the unexcusable.
In the article it’s referred to as the the hypnotic technique ‘linking’ and apparently linking has to work if you are to faint, swoon, or vote for Obama. Here is an exerpt from Page 20:
Logically there is no connection at all between “change” and why he should be President. Same when
Obama describes how bad the economy is, and how bad government is, and then follows with “and that is
why I want to be your next President.” When he has only listed problems, the logical derivative is only that
someone who is good at solving those problems should be President. But he has not made any logical
argument as to why it should be him.