To: Blood of Tyrants
it's donofrio v. wells not donofrio v. obama.
It was about Wells not doing her duty.
SCOTUS refused to hear it, without comment.
N.J. Scotus refused to review, without comment.
So, I'm guessing Judge Sabatino's ruling stands.
And that ruling gave a little wiggle room. "...inasmuch as any challenge to the election results can wait the completion of the election, and the electors will not convene at the Electoral College until December 15th....
With that said, I'm guessing (I know, alot of guessing)all these current legal actions re: Obama's birth are toast.
56 posted on
12/08/2008 11:50:47 AM PST by
stylin19a
( Real Men don't declare unplayable lies)
To: stylin19a; Blood of Tyrants
67 posted on
12/08/2008 12:01:25 PM PST by
stylin19a
( Real Men don't declare unplayable lies)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson