Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Blood of Tyrants
it's donofrio v. wells not donofrio v. obama.
It was about Wells not doing her duty.

SCOTUS refused to hear it, without comment.
N.J. Scotus refused to review, without comment.
So, I'm guessing Judge Sabatino's ruling stands.
And that ruling gave a little wiggle room. "...inasmuch as any challenge to the election results can wait the completion of the election, and the electors will not convene at the Electoral College until December 15th....

With that said, I'm guessing (I know, alot of guessing)all these current legal actions re: Obama's birth are toast.
56 posted on 12/08/2008 11:50:47 AM PST by stylin19a ( Real Men don't declare unplayable lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stylin19a; Blood of Tyrants

another hits SCOTUS

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2145035/posts


67 posted on 12/08/2008 12:01:25 PM PST by stylin19a ( Real Men don't declare unplayable lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson