[r9etb]

A multiverse would be the base material for all of the individual universes to form in. It would have the characteristics of some simple medium that generated laws of physics based on geometry or topography or some other property. The laws of physics would vary in the universe of universe. Some, like ours would be stable. Others would disappear due to instability. Ours may be the only stable one.

Sounds good, until you get to the point of trying to define each of those concepts in a way that is not tied to this universe.

What does "medium" mean? What is a "base material?" Where did it come from?

Beyond that, you still haven't told us how they got there in the first place.

You're just speculating: making some assumptions about how you think it might be.

So before you go feeling all proud of yourself for stumping those silly folks who would posit a "Creator," you might give some attention to the fact that you're in the same boat.

[Soliton]

You're just speculating: making some assumptions about how you think it might be.

No I'm stating the theory

Besides, I don't "believe" in multiverses. It is just one possible explanation. If I were to "believe" that they existed I would need evidence.

[metmom]

So before you go feeling all proud of yourself for stumping those silly folks who would posit a "Creator," you might give some attention to the fact that you're in the same boat.

All it is is positing a *source* without it being an entity to which one may have to answer.

You're just speculating: making some assumptions about how you think it might be.

Which is NOT science.