So you then obviously do not think that this is very serious then since you are trying to make the point that it hurt nothing by Arthur possibly being ineligible. Your objective is obviously to make it seem that it wont hurt anyting if Obama gets away with it.
This is all showing how you think on these issues and what agenda you hold, imo.
You even made a point of acting as if you believed someone might be an abortion bomber if they dont accept a Supreme Court decision. I really think now that you are really a liberal on here trying to influence this issue for Obama’s favor or something.
No, I think it was serious with President Arthur, just as serious as the issue is with Obama. They are both equally serious under the Constitution...
And no..., I don’t think that I’m accusing someone of being an abortion clinic bomber. I said that being that kind of “bomber” — is not the way to reject the court’s decision for abortion.
I’ll reprint the wording here —
So, when you say “reject” it — the question is are you going to reject it by blowing up abortion clinics with bombs? Or are you going to reject it by shooting abortion doctors dead? If so, that’s not the kind of rejection that I would be talking about.
That’s explaining the way to *not* reject the court’s decision.
However, on the other hand, if you’re saying that there exists no people who respond in that way — then no, that’s not correct. There are definitely some (a very few) who do respond that way in that particular situation of the Supreme Court’s decision. Fortunately they are very few.
Oh, and saying that one is a liberal... well, I did take the liberal/conservative test... :-)
You can see the results on my home page... if you want.