B freaking S.
He is a liar.
Post to me if reveals everything tonight or even anything relevant. Otherwise, what’s the point of this but to have the reason of divorce as “mental anguish.” I really don’t care about their divorce. I only care if it shows something relevant about Barack.
You said — “He is a liar. Post to me if reveals everything tonight or even anything relevant. Otherwise, what’s the point of this but to have the reason of divorce as “mental anguish.” I really don’t care about their divorce. I only care if it shows something relevant about Barack.”
Ed Hale learned the same kind of thing, of how to “string along people” from Chief Editor Korir from API (African Press International). He’s basically doing the same thing here, as the chief.
You see, you need to listen to his show. Then he’ll tell you when they’re going to get the next bit of information, and then you need to listen to the show again. And then you’ll get something else, and then you need to listen to the show again. Do you get the idea... LOL...
“Otherwise, what’s the point of this but to have the reason of divorce as “mental anguish.” I really don’t care about their divorce. I only care if it shows something relevant about Barack.”
Point is, we need the entertainment on a Friday after New Years.
"Mental anguish" or "emotional cruelty" were common grounds in the days before "no-fault" divorce. They didn't take much to prove if uncontested, didn't carry any criminal penalty, and would be accepted in jurisdictions where "irreconcilable differences" wasn't enough of a reason.