Does everybody who posts here have to agree with JimRob on every issue? Does JimRob's opinion on scientific matters mean they are more credible?
I don't see the point you're making, and the 20 point type makes it look childish.
Fichori continues to bring it up because people like you continue to dishonestly argue that your position is the conservative one or the majority one when it’s CLEARLY neither.
You and your ilk continue to be under the cultish impression that you’re going to turn your side of this argument into the accepted conservative norm. It’s not and it will bever be.
You appear to be confused, daily, about which site you’re posting on.
With this blatant dishonesty, you should consider yourself lucky to be tolerated by Jim, and allowed to post on FR, quite frankly.
Re #46.
What tpanther said. (#51)
JR's comments there are more about conservativism than science.
That's funny that you should react that way when you're off on some screed about *newbs*. If you're going to throw your weight around because you've been here longer, the same could apply to JR. Compared to him, you're the newb.
Jim has made himself quite clear on this particular issue. He has stated that he will not allow anyone to post against his core Christian beliefs, which includes creationism. - If you're so at odds with those beliefs, why would you want to be here?
Jim is highly respected by the vast majority here, even if we may from time to time have a different opinion about some particular issue, and so we do not taunt him on his beliefs. Those that do usually end up taking a long hike off a very close cliff.