[grey_whiskers]

Not in context. And not if you read carefully -- the post I replied to ended with the statement "it's not just about the science". So the group who has been making that claim is the evolutionists.

But the reason it LOOKS ambiguous, is, like I said, that the Gramscian approach of taking over an institution and thereby influencing mindsets, works, regardless of *who* is taking over the institution.

And both sides claim to be fighting for "the truth" which makes the need for popcorn all the more urgent.

Cheers!

[going hot]

Not in context. And not if you read carefully -- the post I replied to ended with the statement "it's not just about the science". So the group who has been making that claim is the evolutionists.

I beg to offer divergent views. Either group has been guilty (if I may utilize that word) of stating or implying that it is not just about the science.

And both sides claim to be fighting for "the truth" which makes the need for popcorn all the more urgent.

Some in both groups certainly are.

I wonder who would be more surprised, or offended, in learning that they are both correct?