Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: count-your-change
"So, I'll go on using the term, Darwinism, and quite properly so."

And you'll continue to be an idiot if you do. Just out of curiosity, I looked up the etymology of "Darwinism". It turns out that the word has no relationship to the Charles Darwin scientific idea of the origin of species by "survival of the fittest", but was actually coined to describe the philosophical ideas of ERASMUS Darwin, which is what you creationists are actually making war on. I suggest you leave the science to the scientists, and stick learn some philosophy.

925 posted on 01/30/2009 6:04:54 PM PST by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 792 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
First error: You have no references just a statement you make.

Second error: I am not a creationist.

Third error: Several searches gave C. Darwin as the source of “Darwinism” as did ‘The Online Etymology Dictionary’.

Fourth error: Calling me an idiot.

Darwinism is correct for the Darwin's evolution theory and hence I will continue to use.

930 posted on 01/30/2009 6:30:18 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 925 | View Replies ]

To: Wonder Warthog
Where did you look it up?

Is it from a commonly accepted source?

Are there other sources who list the "evo" meaning as a secondary, vernacular usage?

(...and how old is the source, anyway? Languages change -- I thought I read that "blogging" recently was added to the Oxford Unabridged...)

Cheers!

932 posted on 01/30/2009 6:33:17 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 925 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson