Posted on 06/28/2009 4:16:43 PM PDT by Maelstorm
Associate director of Duke University's Center for Health Policy,
Frank Lombard, was recently arrested by the FBI and charged
with offering up his adopted 5-year-old African American son
for sex to an undercover cop. Lombard admitted to molesting his
own adopted son to the undercover officer in an online chat room
under the user name "Perv Dad for Fun". He invited the under
cover officer to travel to North Carolina to rape his already-molested
adopted son. Lombard faces 20 years in prison if convicted but is
not eligible for the death penalty.
Lombard bragged to the detective that “the abuse of the child was
easier when the child was too young to talk or know what was
happening, but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl
during the molestation,” according to the detective’s affidavit.
Lombard is gay and adopted the two children together with his
partner. He lists himself as a fan of controversial gay Bishop
Gene Robinson on his facebook page.
http://www.facebook.com/people/Frank-Lombard/1316445#/friends.php?id=1316445
The big question remains on how Duke University and the media will
address this in light of explosive nature of gay adoption and homo-
sexuality in the current political environment. So far the mainstream
media has been mum on this issue even though they were quick to
rush judgment in the case of the Duke Lacrosse players which were later
found to be innocent.
This case also has the potential to highlight a growing number of similar
cases over the past few years in which gay adoptive parents have been
found to be molesting their adoptive children. One of the most shocking
cases comes from the UK where Ian Wathey, 41, was jailed for five years
and his partner, Craig Faunch, 32, for six years after being found guilty of
several counts of involving the abuse of four boys aged between eight
and 14. This was the first gay male couple in the UK to be approved for
foster care. Social workers said that they were afraid of being labeled
homophobes and ignored some signs that would've otherwise indicated
abuse. This pattern of abuse is not just limited to adoptive and foster parents.
Just this last month a gay rights campaigner and executive adviser on child
sex issues, James Rennie,was found to be leading a double life as leader
of pedophile ring and carried out an attack on a three-month-old baby boy
while baby sitting him for friends.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1178354/Gay-rights-campaigner-led-double-life-leader-paedophile-ring-carried-catalogue-child-abuse.html
The question remains whether this pattern of child sexual abuse and male
homosexuals will be seen as a validation of some studies which suggest
that homosexual men are more than 40 times more likely than the general
population to molest. Dr. Judith Reisman Ph.D. one such researcher who
found this to be the case states clearly "You're looking at a much
higher rate of abuse,".This follows other studies that show that homo-
sexuals are more likely to have been abused as children. Statistics also
show that children that are abused are more likely to become abusers
with as many as 70% of parents who abuse having also been abused
themselves.
Can modern political correctness and political activism be resolved
with a growing body of evidence showing a clear connection
between male homosexuality and child abuse? Not all homosexuals
are abusers but far too many are to be ignored.
The media would have reported on this story if a white Southern Minister had tried to sell a black 5 year old girl for adult men to rape.
It's one of those things - the media has no morality beyond "those they hate". They will stick it to us for jaywalking and give a pass to a man who rapes children.
Don't support the liberal establishment, their businesses, or their charities.
This case had connections to the recent US child porn bust code name Shattered Innocence. The press don’t want to have any healing debate going on around these issues. What gets me is that it isn’t just where homosexuality is concerned but all sexual issues except of course the ones which they can’t avoid reporting (like Edwards and horn dog Clinton). They will not be honest where homosexuality and gay rights is concerned. The cost of the brave new sexual permissive society that is being driven largely by the sexual activism of the left is costing billions in health care cost, social welfare cost, etc far exceeding the cost of such popular bugbears as tobacco and illegal drug use.
It isn’t even that all homosexuals fit this profile. The problem is very many do. The interesting thing I always found is that the lopsided nature of male and female homosexuality mirrors other sexual disorders. Males whether it be criminal or non criminal sexual disorder always show a much higher incidence than women. Incidental homosexuality though is increasing among young women due to the permissive nature of today’s society and the pressure from men on campuses for a little “girl on girl” action and such as well as open predatory lesbianism that is tolerated and also almost never reported.
I agree. I believe that most homosexuals are as offended by this as we are... But I wonder why the gay community isn't condemning this ... Why aren't we hearing their voices?
Lots of gays work in the media - why aren't they front and center on this issue?
Those reporters would be out there en mass if it was a Southern Baptists Minister caught doing this - or a Republican - or a teacher at a Christian College.
Why the double standard? Do they believe it's OK for liberals to rape children but not for conservatives to rape children?
Or is the bias and hatred so ingrained in our media that rapists who sell children get passes if they belong to powerful dem lobby groups like gays?
The "press" avoided the Edwards story all the way up until a picture was published of him holding his love child.
The same ( not so believable ) press was ready to string up Monica and her mother as being "crazy" until the appearance of the "blue dress".
The press had no intention of covering either of those stories honestly - if they could they would have lied for the dems and hurt the innocent people who were telling the truth. Both for Edwards and for Clinton.
The MSM was forced to be truthful by overwhelming PROOF. It's sad - there was a time when I looked up to our free press. Now I'm just disgusted.
what nothing on the news about this
ARF
just like when they reported on the catholic church , . Instead of saying that they were homosexuals doing this they left it out.
man touches a boy is a homosexual, therefore it is a homosexual problem.
‘
If you count all the molestations in this country then most are done by homosexuals but of course the left hate facts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.