Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Smokeyblue

Why are the twins birth certificate numbers 151-61-10637 and 151-61-10638 while Obama's is 151-1961-010641?

The twins just have "61" instead of "1961". Anyone know why there's a difference in the numbering format?

53 posted on 07/28/2009 3:08:27 PM PDT by Jen ("Oppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve standing army, enslaved press & disarmed populace.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jen
151-1961-010641?

Exactly, they tried to fake the stamp it looks like. Someone needs to check the ones after Obama's to see what the numbers are

58 posted on 07/28/2009 3:11:10 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (Everything that deceives also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: Jen

We need to find out who *639 and *640 are and see exactly how many days went by before anne could get back from Kenya.


60 posted on 07/28/2009 3:11:56 PM PDT by Typical_Whitey (Imagine if Bush had said the police acted stupidly when a black cop arrests a mouthy KKK member.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: Jen

The plot thickens again.


61 posted on 07/28/2009 3:14:18 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: Jen

My guess is the Hawaii COLB system converts an ‘’old’’ 2-digit birth certificate year into a 4-digit year since no one was worrying about the Y2K computer issue back in 1961. So many of these questions can only be answered by seeing the original long form. What number is printed on it?


69 posted on 07/28/2009 3:25:34 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: Jen
The twins just have "61" instead of "1961". Anyone know why there's a difference in the numbering format?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2000_problem

70 posted on 07/28/2009 3:26:25 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: Jen

I suspect they went from 61 to 1961 around the year 2000 and modified new certificates issued with old numbers...would 2001 be 01 or is that 1901?

the extra 0 is probably because of increase in population...


73 posted on 07/28/2009 3:27:33 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: Jen; LucyT; Polarik; pissant

The twins just have "61" instead of "1961". Anyone know why there's a difference in the numbering format?

The "Certification of Live Birth" in Hawaii did not exist until November 2001. If you are from Hawaii, and request a "birth certificate" today, you'll get the abstract "Certification of Live Birth" by default -- it's easier for the clerks to pull that up on their computers and print.

From what I've observed (and shown below), if there are 4 digits for the year that the person was born (also Y2K compliant), then the form is a "Certification of Live Birth":

Jeremy Scott Smith Certification


... vs a "Certificate of Live Birth", which shows only the last two digits of the year that the person was born:

Obama has a "Certificate of Live Birth" (or similar) as a ROOT DOCUMENT. That is "original birth certificate" that he's hiding.


93 posted on 07/28/2009 3:47:28 PM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson