Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reservist questioning Obama's citizenship wants judge recused
Tampa Bay Online ^ | August 7, 2009 | Elaine Silvestrini

Posted on 08/08/2009 6:03:59 PM PDT by real_patriotic_american

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle

By Obama not releasing his original long form birth certificate, he has answered the question for us. He can counter by simply releasing it. When someone hides something, they have something to hide.

If you have not already seen this, 0bama’s Noelani Elementary School Kindergarten records are oddly missing from the State of Hawaii Department of Education.

This is an important feature because K-records for original school entry would have contained the following:

1. His REAL Birth Certificate.

2. An application with the following:

—1. His Legal name.
—2. Parents or Legal Guardians’ names.
—3. Date of Birth
—4. Place of Birth
—5. Vaccination Records (revealing a timeline to the place and DOB.)

It also is important for two reasons:

A. The Dept. of Education does not “lose” the records of one particular student. (Who paid whom what sum to make this record disappear?)

B. There would have been NO shameful low-test scores, NO embarrassing Equal Opportunity advancements, and NO trails of fraudulent funding to hide which could possibly ‘excuse’ the quashing of public school Kindergarten entry records.

For the rest of his life he attended very expensive private schools and has had his records legally sealed to deny the public, his true life story.

This is different. Hawaii should be able to verify he attended their school since he is featured in class photographs. State and federal tax dollars paid for his initial year of education. Why is there no documentation?

Why is this portion of Obama’s life intentionally erased? Is this fraudulent? Officials within the State of Hawaii’s Dept. of Health & Dept. of Education may soon have to answer questions in court.


22 posted on 08/09/2009 12:25:22 PM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; real_patriotic_american

Stefan Frederick Cook and his California attorney, Orly Taitz, have filed motions in U.S. District Court asking that Judge Richard A. Lazzara be removed from his case and seeking a rehearing on complaints Lazzara dismissed.


Judge Lazzara has denied both motions as “frivolous and wholly without merit.” I think he did it on the same day that the motions were filed.


23 posted on 08/09/2009 2:22:30 PM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american

Once Obama is ousted for his not being an NBC and John McCain does not qualify for the office since he is not an NBC and Gov. Palin becomes president, Ihope the she appoints Orly to the USSC to replace Sotomayor.


24 posted on 08/09/2009 3:17:53 PM PDT by Uncle Slayton (Texan Pride)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Slayton

McCain is a natural born citizen since his father was out of the country serving in the military when he was born. That’s an old one.


25 posted on 08/09/2009 3:25:15 PM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american

No, one must be born on American soil to be a natural born citizen.


26 posted on 08/09/2009 4:03:32 PM PDT by Uncle Slayton (Texan Pride)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan
Judge Lazzara has denied both motions as “frivolous and wholly without merit.” I think he did it on the same day that the motions were filed.

How much time should he have allowed before finding the suits frivolous and wholly without merit?

27 posted on 08/09/2009 5:03:48 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Judge Lazzara has denied both motions as “frivolous and wholly without merit.” I think he did it on the same day that the motions were filed.

How much time should he have allowed before finding the suits frivolous and wholly without merit?


Only the time necessary to read them and determine that they were frivolous and without merit. In my opinion, that shouldn’t have taken very long. The pleadings complained that the judge took “only” four days to rule on their TRO. ?!?!?! Now, I’ve heard of litigants complaining that the judge took too long to rule on their TRO, but I have never ever heard of a litigant complaining that the judge ruled on their TRO too quickly or that ruling on their TRO too quickly clearly showed bias.


28 posted on 08/09/2009 5:31:39 PM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson