Replies

If you think we don't have the right to an honest fraud free election and that that right is abridged if an un-qualified candidate is elected, and that the abridgement does not constitute a loss to every voter, then you are once again beyond helpless.

I'd say that others around here are far beyond that. If you think that he's un-qualified then prove it. Don't whine about "Well he won't give us his birth certificate" but instead go out and prove your case. Find evidence. You have done none of that, certainly nothing that will remotely stand up in court.

It is unusual that someone will go through so many contortions and distortions to deny the effort of those who merely want the truth to be publicized.

Distortions? For example.

LOL. I am pointing this out to the readers, because NS has heard it many times. You keep wanting me to prove something that can't be proven until the accused fraud is required by someone standing up for the constitution to present his documents; documents he has been spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to hide. Normal, thinking people call this "guilty behavior."

You believe that the constitution cannot be enforced by people who took oaths to do so.

You believe that voters are not injured when their right to an honest election is abridged.

You asked repeat questions which have been answered dozens of times.

You believe that obfuscation is more important than seeking the truth.

You believe that free people do not have the right to know if their highest elected official is qualified for office.

How do I know you believe all of this? Simple, I have read your misguided and disruptive posts for the last few months in which you continuously challenge those who merely seek the truth.

I came here to correct one of your disciples. When you learn something or have something new to say or just want to admit you're just keeping an argument going, let me know and I may spend more than 5 minutes on your education.