Replies

1 posted on 10/26/2009 11:23:08 AM PDT by ShadowAce

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

2 posted on 10/26/2009 11:23:45 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)

To: ShadowAce

BTTT

3 posted on 10/26/2009 11:24:46 AM PDT by nevergore ("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")

To: ShadowAce

This is the kind of regulation I was looking for, generalized and light-handed, restricted to the essence of net neutrality.

4 posted on 10/26/2009 11:33:55 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat

To: ShadowAce

Number one rule in the Oil Patch:

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

I think that applies here as well.

5 posted on 10/26/2009 11:35:22 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)

To: ShadowAce

Why am I skeptical of a government plan for something so benign sounding as “net neutrality”? Is it as harmless as it sounds?

6 posted on 10/26/2009 11:47:34 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie

To: ShadowAce

Bump for a later look.

8 posted on 10/26/2009 11:50:32 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Waste and fraud are synonymous with gov't spending)

To: ShadowAce

I would prefer an industry solution much the same way new tech standards are set, like WiFi, Bluetooth, USB, etc.

12 posted on 10/26/2009 12:53:31 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794