“The concept of fairness doctrine is opposite to net neutrality. Each negates the other.”
So you are basing your accptance of government regulation on communications on the title of the bill and not on it’s actual impact?
It’s ok to regulate the internet because they called it net nuetrality? Would the ‘Fairness’ doctrine be ok if they called it the radio neutrality and save the children doctrine?
This isn't a regulation of the Internet, it's a regulation of the end-user ISPs, which are already regulated, and have been given billions in money, tax breaks and other allowances from the taxpayers on promises not delivered.