Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ozzymandus

Sugar and HFCS react differently in the Liver. HFCS strains the Liver much worse than Cane Sugar.


12 posted on 11/11/2009 12:12:58 PM PST by jacksonstate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: jacksonstate
Sugar and HFCS react differently in the Liver. HFCS strains the Liver much worse than Cane Sugar.

And that's exactly part of the problem. HFCS has to pass through the liver twice to digest it. I always try to avoid HFCS but it's ubiquitous. On the other hand, while HFCS is bad for you, I bet people ingesting this much sugar are already fat with bad lipid profiles. However, no doubt HFCS exacerbates the problem and should be avoided.

18 posted on 11/11/2009 12:22:16 PM PST by Obadiah (Obama: Chains you can believe in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: jacksonstate

http://www.westonaprice.org/modernfood/highfructose.html


19 posted on 11/11/2009 12:22:28 PM PST by jacksonstate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: jacksonstate
Sugar and HFCS react differently in the Liver. HFCS strains the Liver much worse than Cane Sugar.

How is that possible when both products are comprised of the same two chemicals? Is fructose and glucose from hydrolyzed sucrose chemically different from glucose and fructose in HFCS?

50 posted on 11/11/2009 3:07:58 PM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson