No they don’t but you are also presuming an awful lot. To restrict the travel of your wife and children to visit their family in a prenup is not only outrageous but would make almost any sane person say wait a minute what’s going on here?
Perhaps you are one of those low life bottom feeder scumbags known as an attorney. Most people do not behave in their lives as you just described.
And if you think Tiger and Elin entered into a voluntary seperation agreement then I guess I can only suggest that you check your medication levels. I think you are more than a bit off
For pete’s sake, you are dumber than a bag of hammers.
Here’s what I said:
“There doesn’t have to be a divorce action filed. Parties can simply enter into a marital separation agreement (binding court order) in which they each agree to do certain things. A judge doesn’t have to rule on the issues because they’re resolved (at least temporarily or until another event occurs, such as a divorce decree being entered), just enter the order. This is especially routine when both parties are represented by counsel. I doubt that Tiger’s lawyers, knowing Elin is from Sweden and has family there, didn’t get strict requirements of her with respect to where the kids can go and for how long. In this case, the parties have a pre-nuptial agreement, so that would be the jumping-off place in terms of their legal issues at this point. They don’t have to have a divorce action filed in order for each party to bind the other to specific actions or to do any of this.”
Here’s what you said in reply (your idiocies, which constitute your entire post, are in quotes):
“No they don’t but you are also presuming an awful lot. To restrict the travel of your wife and children to visit their family in a prenup is not only outrageous but would make almost any sane person say wait a minute what’s going on here?” (I said the pre-nup would be a jumping-off point in terms of an existing legal document to work with rather than filing a divorce action or even a separation agreement with respect to short-term issues, meaning until and if final decisions are made with respect to where the marriage is going to go. I said NOTHING about Elin or any person anywhere ORIGINALLY entering into a pre-nup that prevents the wife from removing the kids from the country, although that would not be such an oddity for some wealthy guy who’s been burned a number of times in prior marriages - not the case here).
“Perhaps you are one of those low life bottom feeder scumbags known as an attorney. Most people do not behave in their lives as you just described.” (In keeping with your stunningly poor reading comprehension skills already demonstrated, you clearly missed my tag line).
“And if you think Tiger and Elin entered into a voluntary seperation agreement then I guess I can only suggest that you check your medication levels.” (I did NOT say Tiger and Elin entered into a separation agreement - by the way, the word is “sepAration”, not sepEration”. I was clearly speaking generally when I said that orders can be entered by seperAtion agreements without a divorce action being filed as a correction to the ignorant, uninformed garbage you originally posted. By the way, your bit here about the medications is so old, hackneyed, and worn out, it’s become as much a cliché revealing ignorance and lack of imagination as the rest of the general, boring stupidity you exhibit in your original post and your reply to me).
“I think you are more than a bit off.” (and I think you couldn’t find your ass with both hands if your life depended on it).
And for your information, dumbass, it’s been reported that Tiger and Elin do indeed have a pre-nup and that it’s been modified. In part, the original set forth that Elin receives a certain sum if they remained married at least a certain number of years. The pre-nup was changed by agreement, and one of the terms changed was the number of years of marriage required and possibly the dollar amount. Other specific changes were not reported, but it was reported that there are other amendments, and it’s also been reported that that sum, possibly increased from what was set forth in the original pre-nup, has been paid. Therefore, the pre-nup IS indeed being used as a vehicle to arrange certain actions, payments, conduct, etc., for the coming short term, and you have NO knowledge that arrangements regarding the childrens’ travel is NOT part of the amended agreement. That would certainly have been a good time and opportunity to address the issue, as I originally said, with no need for a whole new document such as a sepAration agreement, as I also originally said.
So there you have it, long march. You need to take a long march to a long remedial reading comprehension course. Take your time. Be thorough. Don’t hurry back.