Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot; Mase; expat_panama
0.0000034?

Way high.

2 posted on 01/13/2010 8:09:20 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy

Lower your standards....increase your odds.


5 posted on 01/13/2010 8:14:34 PM PST by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: 1rudeboy
0.0000034? Way high.

By at least a factor of 1000. Maybe 1000000?

8 posted on 01/13/2010 8:16:07 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: 1rudeboy
The guy lowered his return by limiting his search area. 

Years ago I used the same formula but began with the 3 billion women in the entire world before narrowing down.   It came out to about a couple dozen good candidates, and dividing by the world's 60 million mi.2 land mass gave me a possible wife for every 2,400  mi.2.  So the odds were that I had to be willing to travel at least a couple thousand miles to find a good wife, so I did and lived happily ever after.

37 posted on 01/14/2010 5:53:59 AM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson