Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Steelfish
[It was never meant to refute the Biblical basis of the founding principles.]
 
"in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination."
 
"[the] Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination"?  Rather a strange lot to afford equal protection IF the founder's intent was to create a solely Christian state.
 

39 posted on 02/15/2010 9:50:02 PM PST by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: LomanBill

No, no, no. One must not confuse the notion of the Biblical foundations of this nation as amply provided you in prior posts with the notion of free will and liberty of conscience. The two are not exclusive. Indeed, they are complementary.

A single thread pulled out of a rich tapestry of evidence and conduct by the Framers is no way to attempt a refutation of what is solid historical fact.

NOTE: Art VI forbade a religious test for public office and forbade nothing more.


40 posted on 02/15/2010 9:58:43 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson