Thank you for your kind reply. I will take heed of it.
As for the other replies, I realize that a site has the right to control content, but I just had the feeling maybe that FR was giving the shaft too easily. There is a certain level of trust that allows one to post viable content, but I guess my complaint is that automating this process to exclude certain sources is not exactly wise. I have to wonder how in the world they came around to censoring the source I tried to use.
As for other remarks, I will just forgive them if need be. Sorry, I don’t comb through my political convictions as if I am a GOP politician. The conservative majority in my opinion is not a part of Club GOP. Republican Senators are wimps when faced by their Democratic opponents, and that is what grieves me the most. Either they are wimps or they are in bed with them.
Once a site has been determined to be a bad source, it is perfuectly logical to automatically disallow posts from it. DU comes to mind, as well as any source which has forbidden FR from linking etc ... - it is not the job of the site to justify this - it is YOUR job to find good sources ...
In a way, you seem very Marxist. Maybe you should write a book titled, ‘True and Scientific Conservativism’.
Have you read about the lawsuits?
Do you think that those could play a role?
The decision isn’t only just JR and JR’s.