To: Minn
One of many narrow views of conservatism. I would love to have all of my paycheck, and be able to decide exactly what I am going to pay to the government and what parts of it. This is actually my right in the Constitution.
Not pointing any fingers, but this train has only one track, and it is not exactly on track.
Such vehemence for a tad of criticism is not entirely civil, and it only reinforces the fact that I have long believed that the Internet is a place to only pit one troll against another. I can’t believe I lowered myself to make an appeal to anyone about this here that were not given the same attention to reasons why they felt the way they did.
31 posted on
02/17/2010 1:03:43 AM PST by
ImperialistDaddy
(Stupidity has a name...liberalism!)
To: ImperialistDaddy
One of many narrow views of conservatism. I would love to have all of my paycheck, and be able to decide exactly what I am going to pay to the government and what parts of it. This is actually my right in the Constitution. ah, which part of the constitution?
36 posted on
02/17/2010 1:05:57 AM PST by
An.American.Expatriate
(Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
To: ImperialistDaddy
Such vehemence for a tad of criticism is not entirely civil Perhaps, but whoever said it was? Sometimes smacking down whiners is just plain fun.
And to come on here whining about how others permit you to utilize their private property isn't entirely conservative. Maybe JimRob would like to have back the part of his paycheck you appropriated for your soapbox, that is actually his right under the constitution.
49 posted on
02/17/2010 1:17:10 AM PST by
Minn
(Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
To: ImperialistDaddy
Consider for a moment that those who have been here a lot longer than you may have good reason for holding views which you may not immediately agree with. Suffice to say that some ideas which are new and exciting to you are old and boring and idiotic to others - that's not a slam against you, just a reminder that perhaps you should listen to your virtual elders instead of going out of your way to dis them.
This is Jim Robinson's home, and some topics (and sources thereof) are not welcome in his home - that's not censorship, that's private property rights. You are free to discuss the topic on your own website.
Freedom of the press does not include the irrefusable right to use someone else's press.
50 posted on
02/17/2010 1:17:11 AM PST by
ctdonath2
(Pelosi is practically President; the Obama is just her talk show host.)
To: ImperialistDaddy
I cant believe I lowered myself to make an appeal to anyone about this here that were not given the same attention to reasons why they felt the way they did.Can you put that sentence into English?
55 posted on
02/17/2010 1:21:32 AM PST by
TigersEye
(It's the Marxism, stupid! ... And they call themselves Progressives.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson