Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/21/2010 11:35:13 AM PST by cajuncow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cajuncow

LOL, they are just making this $-it up now.

Remember a few years back was supposed to be the worst year ever and there were almost none. they tried the same prediction the following year and..same result.


2 posted on 02/21/2010 11:36:54 AM PST by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the existing Constitution"Obama Adviser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cajuncow

I just this while browsing WRAL.

It’s funny: we’ll see bigger and stronger storms, less of them, and we don’t if this is already occurring.

Hmm. That sounds so scientific :)


3 posted on 02/21/2010 11:38:12 AM PST by Aqua225 (Realist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cajuncow
I guess this would also mean that we'll be seeing stronger but fewer earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.

Sarc/

6 posted on 02/21/2010 11:44:21 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (If the CIA and NASA are going to "monitor climate change", why the hell do we need the EPA?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cajuncow; markomalley; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; Desdemona; ...
Yeah, sure.

 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

7 posted on 02/21/2010 11:46:59 AM PST by steelyourfaith (FReepers were opposed to Obama even before it was cool to be against Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cajuncow

Climate Change Experts. Often wrong but never in doubt.


8 posted on 02/21/2010 11:51:39 AM PST by Mobties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cajuncow
Gee.. See if I have this right.
9 posted on 02/21/2010 12:00:01 PM PST by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cajuncow
seeming to settle a scientific debate on the subject.

How many times have we heard this BS?

11 posted on 02/21/2010 12:08:36 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cajuncow

What did they do, vote on it?


12 posted on 02/21/2010 12:10:36 PM PST by BlueLancer (I'm getting a fine tootsy-frootsying right here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cajuncow

Yeah, they said this in 2006 also. I think 2009 was one of the most quiet years ever.


13 posted on 02/21/2010 12:11:02 PM PST by VeniVidiVici ("Bring out yer dead! Bring out your dead!" - Cries of a Navy Corpseman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cajuncow
The earth will take care of itself because it's alive. Too hot?, bring on more water vapor and clouds (kicking radiation back into space). When people get hot they sweat- heat is removed as water turns to vapor (gas).

Earth, like humans, can deal with either extreme (hot or cold) by changing it's reflectivity which happens to coincide with air's ability to hold moisture (more when hot, less when cold).

IF it's getting warmer (which is doubtful) and IF CO2 is the culprit, expect more clouds to correct the situation. Bigger storms with greater intensity? Not if it's a gradual warming. To whip-up the atmosphere like that, you'd need pulses of energy from the sun where earth makes rapid corrections to spikes in radiation.

My concern would be whether carbon dioxide can impede the earth's ability to 'sweat' as that would be serious- like someone in the desert without sweat glands. Since I'm not a chemist, I don't know if CO2 could displace water vapor and earth's ability to 'cool' itself from whatever 'warming' might take place.

My guess is that it wouldn't, but by adding CO2 to H2O you might get something a little more acidic so I'll pick-up some azaleas and other acid-loving plants to 'correct' this aberration.

17 posted on 02/21/2010 12:31:22 PM PST by budwiesest (It's that girl from Alaska, again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cajuncow

You know that they are reaching when they bring up Katrina....This particular hurricane will of course be long remembered because of the damage it did but in the grand scheme of things, there have been worse ones that have made landfall. Katrina did a lot of damage in Mississippi but it was the flooding of NOLA that it will forever be associated with... and that event had far less to do with the ferocity of the storm than it had to do with levies that that were totally inadequate.


19 posted on 02/21/2010 1:13:26 PM PST by Asfarastheeastisfromthewest... (“The urge to save humanity is almost always a false-face for the urge to rule it.”....Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cajuncow

The funny thing is that, while big and powerful and self-important mankind can’t push around the weather, except according to Al “Nimrod” Gore, an ordinary plankton bloom might be able to.

That is, a plankton bloom at sea, can warm the surface temperature of the water over a large area by a degree or two, which could raise the strength of a hurricane by one force level.

Well, if plankton can do that, can we do something like that, but in the opposite direction? That is, cooling water surface temperature over a large area?

Possibly. Some years ago, a brilliant and inventive scientist had an unusual idea. He noted that warm sea water has a very thin layer on its surface that is much warmer, but acts to limit evaporation of the cooler water just a few millimeters beneath it. You can even notice this effect in a still swimming pool on a very hot day.

So, he figured, if that thin layer of warm water could be busted up, evaporation would increase over many square miles of water, and if done at a large scale out at sea, it might be enough to cause rain inland.

His idea was to create enormous vertical wind turbines, that would pump out a mist of cold sea water into the air. And this mist would itself cool because of evaporation, and break up the thin, warm layer below it.

Well, using wind turbines for this would be the big engineering problem, by why use them at all? Just a few fire fighting ships well ahead of the path of a hurricane could in concert spray a great quantity of water into the air, that the still gentle incoming winds from the hurricane, then continue to spray as they advance along the projected route.

All they have to do is just cool down a few millimeters of water over a large area, then let evaporation continue the cooling process. By the time the hurricane arrives, hopefully it would be enough to lower its force by one level.

And that might make all the difference in the world.


20 posted on 02/21/2010 1:17:27 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson