The question about the legality of 0bama Sr’s marriages to both Kezia and Stanley Ann are not, from what I’ve read, entirely settled issues. There is hearsay only in the case of Kezia (some quote about cattle and dowry); it seems some records might be able to be found in Kenya but no doubt at the risk of life and limb. In the case of SADO and 0bama Sr, there are the divorce records plus some kind of marriage record found in HI. Not the record itself but (can’t remember the right terminology) a record of a record. One of the researchers will know better.
0bama Sr’s first marriage to Kezia (if there was one) was a tribal/Muslim marriage with rules unknown to us. Muslim marriages allow 4 wives, Luo tribal laws IIRC do as well.
Would a tribal marriage count under US or HI law, especially since SADO and 0bama Sr appear to have married in HI and had a subsequent divorce. The question of why the divorce if they didn’t marry came up, then the record of a marriage was discovered. She didn’t ask any alimony, and obviously Sr wanted nothing to do with his offspring. So what was the purpose of the divorce, unless she wanted welfare benefits and/or to be free to re-marry.
And damn Obama for hiding his records. He has no right to do that, when there is a question of a matter of law about his eligibility to the office he sought.
And damn the Pubbies -- for not standing up on any of this!