Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
Those who thought that “blood” was everything could never stand that the most famous and some of the most well written things ever set to pen in the English language were written by a ‘bloody commoner’.

There is no other real reason to doubt that Shakespear wrote the plays that he said he wrote, for the troop that performed them.

Moreover, as the “popular entertainment” of the day; it was seen as no more classy or high falutin’ than a TV sitcom.

6 posted on 06/07/2010 4:53:40 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
The best indication that "Shakespeare" didn't write those plays is the name itself. As far back as Elizabethan times, a "spear shaker" was a third-echelon player, below even Supporting Cast: a human presence on the stage who had to be there just because someone had to be there.

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto

17 posted on 06/07/2010 5:09:59 PM PDT by fporretto (This tagline is programming you in ways that will not be apparent for years. Forget! Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: allmendream

Troupe.


23 posted on 06/07/2010 5:48:28 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson