Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Richard Kimball
Having a college responsible for a player's behavior off the field is probably both unconstitutional and unethical.

The player and their parents (whether good or bad people) do have a right to privacy. How without violating a player's privacy do you find out what is going on?
Since the college in most cases can't, how could the NCAA hold a college responsible for a player's life off the field?

If the NCAA tells the college the player is doing something wrong and they ORDER the college to bench them, then fine.
Outside of that, I don't think there is a legality in what the NCAA wants from colleges.

I think USC should take the NCAA to court, the NCAA have been brought to court before at another time and lost.

64 posted on 06/10/2010 9:45:11 PM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: A CA Guy
Having a college responsible for a player's behavior off the field is probably both unconstitutional and unethical.

NCAA disagrees.

The whole amateur athlete system for college football is broken. The colleges are making huge bucks. Just the gate for a USC home game is five million. A player like Bush has millions coming when he turns pro, but is supposed to live poor while he makes millions for the college. That said, currently the NCAA requires the students to not accept compensation for their play other than that allowed under NCAA rules. The colleges are expected to enforce these rules.

65 posted on 06/10/2010 10:22:56 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson