Oh my. Like every creationist on an Internet forum before you, you’ve trotted out yet another poorly constructed website that seeks to argue from authority. The mere existence of such websites speaks volumes about the lack of actual science creationism has produced. Real science has no need for such defensive posturing. They are just concerned with actual science, not apologetics.
At least on your preferred site, after mentioning 10 historical scientists who lived before 1860, they DO actually admit that yeah, well, those guys simply couldn’t have been evolutionists. Then they feel the need to pull out the one who did - Werner van Braun (!), who never read a life science book in his esteemed life. So silly. Can’t you see this ruse for what it is?
I also note that the site you gave us has a distinct lack of any research, hypotheses, studies, published papers or science. Does that not bother you? If I go to one of the many thousands of site with actual research, they don’t spend time whining about how many people from antiquity agree with them.
In reality, there are about 25-30 guys with advanced degrees from real universities in the very science that they now reject. Which amounts to nothing. I’m sure you’re aware of Project Steve, the very real but tongue-in-cheek response to these lists of scientists who reject evolution. When there are ten-fold more real scientists named Steve who accept the fact of evolution than all the creationists put together, I think we’re pretty safe sticking with the theory of evolution.
Okay, let’s say I accept your impressive website that lists a whole bunch of impressive scientists who reject evolution. You win that round. Now let’s get to the real stuff...
A) What type of evidence would you require to make you rethink human evolution, and
B) What type of research has your impressive list of real scientists who reject evolution done that specifically undoes one of the tenets of current biological, chemical, astronomical, physical and geologic thought?
Some of your questions surely demonstarte your lack of knowledge about which you think you know so much. Evolution is not a tenent of any of those topics you named; it is merely an unproven theory which many university darwists nazis have tried to frame into a fact. Sorry, it is not going to work here. The simple fact of the matter is that the millions of clear transitional fossils of life forms turning into one and other do not exist. If they did the debate would have been over. I understand you believe it is over, but that is in your imagination, not in the fossil record! Facts don’t lie! And here are some amazing scientists of modern times that prove my points better..
http://www.wayoflife.org/files/6c1a001a0f1a2de4953024ae8e74124b-405.html