Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625
Arctic natives have darker skin, but they live TOO far north for skin-synthesis of Vitamin D from sunlight to work, so light skin would have had no survival value to them.

Harvard medical researchers claim that 92% of American black children and 80% of Hispanic are currently vitamin D deficient. This has little evolutionary effect, they reproduce pretty well. Vitamin D deficiency has some but not much evolutionary pressure. It is insufficient to explain the sudden appearance of white skin. Wouldn't lighter skin have been sufficient to produce vitamin D more efficiently? Pure white skin is cosmetic, and could not have been primarily driven by a minor issue like vitamin D deficiency. The vitamin D theory is neat, tidy, and politically correct, but insufficient in reality. It is not settled science by any means.

83 posted on 07/08/2010 8:16:58 AM PDT by Reeses (Sowcialist: a voter bought with food stamps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Reeses
Vitamin D deficiency has some but not much evolutionary pressure. It is insufficient to explain the sudden appearance of white skin.

Light-colored skin (nobody but an albino is "white") did not occur suddenly. There is a continuum of skin shades from brown in Africa and southern India, through Mediterranean olive-shade, to Scandinavian lightness.

As humans expanded in a northerly direction, those who were more optimally adapted to their current climate had better health and were more likely to survive, bear children, and care for them into adulthood.

85 posted on 07/08/2010 8:46:09 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson